Wilfred Wongs co accused suicided

Anglesey child kidnap accused found dead in prison cell, inquest hears

Former psychiatric nurse, Robert Frith died at HMP Berwyn on November 14

A general view inside HMP Berwyn (Image: Getty Images)

A man charged with an alleged child kidnapping on Anglesey was found dead in his prison cell, an inquest heard.

Robert Frith of Tyn Parc, Holyhead, was discovered suffocated in his bed at HMP Berwyn in Wrexham just after 8.30am on November 14.

Paramedics were called but the the former psychiatric nurse was pronounced dead after being formally identified by prison officers.

An inquest opening at Ruthin County Hall today heard the 65-year-old had been arrested and remanded in custody on November 9, ahead of a plea and trial preparation hearing in relation to the alleged kidnapping of a child in Gaerwen.

Coroner for North Wales east and central, John Gittins said checks had been carried out at the prison at around 5pm on November 13 – the night before Mr Frith was discovered dead.

A general view of HMP Berwyn (Image: Getty Images)

A Home Office postmortem was carried out by Dr Brian Rodgers, who gave a provisional cause of death as plastic bag suffocation.

accused of kidnapping a child under ten on November 4.

Why journalists cover inquests and why it’s crucial that we do

Reporting on an inquest can be one of the hardest types of stories a journalist can write.

More often than not, they are emotionally charged proceedings attended by grief-stricken people who are desperate for answers.

Sometimes, inquests can seem quite clinical due to a coroner’s need to remain impartial and level-headed so that they can draw a conclusion from desperately sad events.

As painful as these proceedings are for those who have lost a loved one, the lessons that can be learned from inquests can go a long way to saving others’ lives.

Families are often surprised – and sometimes angry – when they see a reporter in attendance.

Understandably they worry the nature of their loved one’s death will be sensationalised and that a news story will forever tarnish their memory.

Responsible and ethically minded journalists will do what they can to report inquests sensitively, while not shying away from the often upsetting facts.

It is vital that the public don’t forget that inquests are a type of judicial inquiry; they are after all held in a coroner’s court.

The press has a legal right to attend inquests and has a responsibility to report on them as part of their duty to uphold the principle of ‘open justice’.


But in doing so journalists must follow the guidance provided by the Independent Press Standards Organistion and set out in Editors’ Code of Conduct.

It’s a journalist’s duty to make sure the public understands the reasons why someone has died and to make sure their deaths are not kept secret.

An inquest report can also clear up any rumours or suspicion surrounding a person’s death.

But most importantly of all, an inquest report can draw attention to circumstances which may stop further deaths from happening.

Inquests are not criminal courts – there is no prosecution or defence – they are fact-finding tribunals which seek to answer four key questions:

  • Who is the person who died?
  • Where did they die?
  • When did they die?
  • How did they die?

They do not apportion blame.

Once these questions are answered a coroner will be able to record a conclusion.

The wider lessons that can be learned from an inquest can have far-reaching consequences – but if journalists do not attend them how can the public be made aware?

The harsh reality is they can’t. Coroners often do not publish the results of an inquest.

Should journalists shy away from attending inquests then an entire arm of the judicial system – and numerous others who need to answer vital questions – is not held to account.

Inquests can often prompt a wider discussion on serious issues, the most recent of these being mental health and suicide.

Editors actively ask and encourage reporters to speak to the family and friends of a person who is the subject of an inquest.

Their contributions help us create a clearer picture of the person who died and also provides the opportunity to pay tribute to their loved one.

Often families do not wish to speak to the press and of course that decision has to be respected.

However, as has been seen by many brilliant campaigns run by newspapers and websites up and down the country, the input of a person’s family and friends can make all the difference in helping to save others.

Without the attendance of the press at inquests questions will remain unanswered, debates unargued and lives lost.

He was due to appear again before Caernarfon Crown Court on December 7.

The other defendants in the case are Jane Claire Going-Hill, 59, of Pump Street,  Holyhead; Anke Hill, 50, of Cae Glas, Holyhead; Edward Stevenson, 68, of Parnell Close, Maidenbower, Crawley, West Sussex; Janet Stevenson, 66, a charity counsellor, of Parnell Close, Maidenbower, Crawley, West Sussex and Wilfred Wong, 55, of Pied Bull Court, Galen Place, Camden, London.


Prosecutor James Neary said the defendants are alleged to have “unlawfully and by force or fraud took or carried away a child against his will”.

Wong is also charged with possessing a knife.

You can now get all the latest news and reports sent straight to you for FREE. Sign up to our court newsletter here

One thought on “Wilfred Wongs co accused suicided”

  1. This is a brave and interesting site and the story re Wong is important to tell. However, I became increasingly cross with the “we must report on inquests” part of this article, which was most of it. Especially this year, much of the public are sickened by the press and so there is massive mistrust on an unprecedented scale. Reporters aren’t sensitive, they just want stories. Even if they take the ‘we’re truth telling’ angle, it’s inappropriate at best to have a stranger who intends to publicise their view at this very emotive event. Reporters always have an angle, and their coolness makes their presence reprehensible. If one is invited by loved ones to have a suspicious death made known and held to account, that is different; but then the reporter’s ethics need to be impeccable. I cannot imagine one I’d trust in such a circumstance – how can one person be truth teller for the myriad of people concerned? I would be more than angry – I’d forcibly eject on pain of charges.

    The other issue is the glibly mentioned ‘mental health and suicide’ topic. These two do not go together, and that implied ampersand gives more excuse to incarcerate and medicate would-be suicidals. I would have thought that this site would be as aware of any of how mental health is an excuse to contain and torture those who don’t fit; and now with covid as an excuse to bully on to pretext of preventative physical health grounds, it should be chillingly obvious how the same has long been happening in so called mental health for a long time. It is also about compliance and tiny windows of what is normal, and of allowable self expression. Hence I am chilled and disappointed that you have written what you have on this.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *