Establishment Darkness

by craig on October 3, 2012 12:03 pm in Uncategorized
I am a guest speaker tomorrow at the NUJ Conference in Newcastle, on the subject of blogging. Never one to appease an audience, I shall give them it straight on my opinions of the collusion between mainstream media and power, and thus those who work within it. I expect to hear a lot about how bloggers are irresponsible, do not check sources etc.
I shall be drawing on some of the content of this talk:
I post this again because nowadays this website has far more readers than when I first posted it, and because it encapsulates my thoughts rather well.
I shall tell the NUJ that the mainstream media remains very constrained in what they publish. The Jimmy Saville affair broke on the internet in a big way a year ago, and yet the mainstream media is only now catching up – and still not making key links, like to Haut de la Garenne.
I receive, constantly, emails from people wishing me to take up various cases on my blog and furnishing information. 95% of the time I do not publish because I am not able to investigate fully (there is just one of me) and I do not know the source: the exclusives on this blog come mostly from my access to well-placed sources I have known for years through my past diplomatic career, and trust.
A notable proportion of the cases brought to me by those I do not know involve alleged paedophile rings. I was sent information about Haut de la Garenne for years, which named a string of senior people alleged to take advantage of organised paedophilia in the care home. Among the judges, politicians and aristocracy, there was indeed the name of Jimmy Saville. I have to admit it was not just that I could not prove any of it, I was actively sceptical about what seemed a random list of names of the famous. We now know for certain that Saville visited the place several times. The whole Haut De La Garenne investigation always seemed to obscure more than it revealed; I do hope it is mow re-opened, and taken away from the local Jersey police.
Another case which caused me great concern was that of Hollie Greig, where the jailing of Robert Green seemed to me vicious and unjustified. But I had earlier refused a request on behalf of the Greig family to involve myself in the case because the allegations made seemed to me incapable of proof without investigative powers and resources of the kind the police have. That the police do not properly deploy those resources where allegations involve the powerful appears to me too often to be too likely. Where the accusation is that the judicial establishment is involved in a paedophile ring, for the same judicial establishment to start jailing campaigners is extraordinary.
But the Alisher Usmanov and Adam Werritty cases will be the main thrust of my talk to the NUJ. In the first, the mainstream media still to this day persist in covering up the criminal past of the convicted blackmailer and Putin cohort who purchased 10% of Facebook and 35% of Arsenal Football Club.
The Werritty case is much more sinister because it goes to the media collusion in burying evidence of the influence of Israel on British politics. The public were told that Werritty was at a small number of meetings where he should not have been. The mainstream media refused to discuss why he was at those meetings or what his participation was actually about – leaving the public to infer he was merely Fox’s lover or in some way they were making money.
Even when I was able to produce undeniable evidence that Fox and Werritty held eight meetings with Matthew Gould, now and during six of those meetings British Ambassador to Israel (and Private Secretary to the Foreign Secretary for the first two meetings) the mainstream media refused point blank to publish it. Mossad were present for at least two of those eight meetings. Gus O’Donnell’s report, whcih led to Fox’s resignation, had revealed only two of these eight meetings. This should have been a massive story. The media buried it (with the sole and belated exception of the Independent on Sunday).
No media were prepared to put any investigative resources into what Gould, Werritty and Mossad were doing. I had an impeccable senior source who told me that they were discussing preparing the political ground for an attack on Iran. You would think that, given the Werritty affair caused Fox to resign, that was worth investigating. The media completely blanked it. To this day the fact that Werritty and Fox met Gould eight times has been reported nowhere but one column in the Independent on Sunday.
I think my encounter with the journalistic profession could be quite fun. I shall also be arguing that bloggers should be allowed to join the NUJ; an internal NUJ debate on this is the background to my invitation to speak.
Tweet this post


  1. Craig, your link re the jailing of Robert Green does not work.
  2. It’s because you’ve given the link a “https” (secure server) prefix. It should be:
  3. Thanks – I think I fixed it.
  4. You might also mention the RangersTaxCase blog which was instrumental in mobilising fans against an establishment plan to parachute Rangers FC into the Scottish First Division in spite of serial tax evasion and other irregularities, all the while the MSM vigorously pushing the ‘move along, nothing to see here’ line. The blog won the Orwell Award. It may seem small medicine compared with lunatics planning WW3 but it is indicative of the same absolutely closed agenda. Were it not for bloggers we’d all still be watching Plato’s shadows on the cave wall.
    On the whole I think the question should rather be whether MSM ‘journalists’ should be allowed into the NUJ. Cutting and pasting party-political press releases hardly seems to justify craft membership.
  5. Good luck with mentioning Isr**l in any but the most adulatory terms at a meeting involving the UK press. The current thrust of their propaganda is to depict anyone doing so as a wearer of tinfoil hats – or as a member of AQ. Tread carefully!
  6. “Fox and Gould held eight meetings with Matthew Gould”. Surely “Fox and Werritty held …”?
  7. Nick, thanks corrected.
  8. Craig, do you know if the usually reliable guys at medialens covered the issues surrounding the Werritty case?
  9. “Among the judges, politicians and aristocracy, there was indeed the name of Jimmy Saville”
    Was one of the named politicians a man with the means of visiting Jersey discreetly, even when he was PM?
  10. MJ Yes – but as I say there was an absence of real evidence in what was given to me. It looks like Saville might be right, and that makes the whole more credible – but still not sufficiently so, in my view, to publish names of people I really do not know are guilty or even credibly accused.
  11. The hyperbole is overwhleming. What democracy?
    This Delegate Meeting reaffirms its strong belief in the role of the BBC as the foundation of public service broadcasting in the UK. It recognises the Corporation’s importance in the proper functioning of our democracy and the effect it has in setting an example for other public service broadcasters around the world.
    DM calls on the government to take proper account of the huge affection, approval and respect with which the BBC is held by the overwhelming majority of the population and to restore a licence fee that will enable the BBC to continue providing services which its audiences love and which are admired by professional broadcasters everywhere.
    Motion 28 p 14
  12. Craig dont worry many NUJ members welcome your work and I will see you in Newcastle!
  13. The Medialens editor, the two Davids, Cromwell and Edwards, explain how they started up and why.
  14. Mary I nearly fell off my chair when I read that about the BBC! This must be a parallel universe somewhere in a wonderful broadcasting oasis.
    Branson must be a happy bunny now that First Group have been shown the door and interesting to read that some civil servants have been suspended for making mistakes in the calculations! Oh really, well maybe the sweeteners and brown paper envelopes were a bit too big and bloody obvious this time round, but will anyone actually be fired let alone charged ? Apparently 40 million quid is going to be paid to the bidders !?! Nice little earner then…
  15. Play nice…you never know when you may need the 4th estate !
  16. MJ @3 Oct, 2012 – 12:51 pm
    E. H. !?
  17. Or should that be ‘Father Ted’ ?
  18. I thought you were going to say Anna Ardin over and over again until you got a sore throat….?
  19. The link you cited ( about Saville’s activities is just nonsense. His proclivities were for young girls not boys. I’ve not seen a shred of evidence to suggest he was into boys.
    And what do we make of this shocking assertion:
    “When Guy Burgess himself defected to Russia his hosts were horrified to discover that he had brought with him his collection of Jane Austen books, together with a poke bonnet and a dress from the period for himself.”
    Honestly. Why bother to cite such garbage? It undermines your whole post.
    (A critical fan!)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *