STOP PRESS CHRIS SPIVEY ILLEGALLY ARRESTED

  • ChrisSpivey – The World Put Right

    chrisspivey.org/

    5 hours ago – Chris Spivey ILLEGALLY arrested. Chris was ILLEGALLY arrested with a warrant for harassment , now not being privy to the so called warrant if …

    You’ve visited this page 2 times. Last visit: 11/04/14
  • Chris Spivey arrested in 2am raid | thecolemanexperience

    thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/…/chrisspiveyarrested-in-2am-ra…

    7 hours ago – Brilliant writer, Chris Spivey, has been arrested in a night-time raid on his home by the desperate powers-that-be. Chris, who is edging ever and …

  • chris spivey arrested for harassment. – guerrilla democracy 

    guerrillademocracy.blogspot.com/…/chrisspiveyarrested-for-harassmen…

    by Matthew Taylor – 6 hours ago – The inevitable has happened and Chris Spivey, the alternative media’s leading on-line journalist has been arrested for harassment.

  • Christopher D Spivey | Facebook

    www.facebook.com/pages/Christopher-D-Spivey/153828944737011

    Christopher D Spivey. … I did a picture of Nick and although I am not artistic like Chrisis,. A real … DADS BEEN ARRESTED CAN U ALL INBOX ME ASAP.

  • Chris Spivey (ChrisSpivey3) on Twitter

    https://twitter.com/ChrisSpivey3

    The latest from Chris Spivey (@ChrisSpivey3). Welcome. … Chris has just beenarrested for harrassment, apparently under section 32,… http://fb.me/37EwsGycK.

  • Chris spivey arrested in Uk – Godlike Productions

    www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message2606012/pg1

    10 hours ago – 8 posts

    At 2am this morning Chris Spivey of Chris Spivey.org was arrested because he mentions on his blog that the Woolwich alledged beheading …

  • Chris spivey has been arrested – David Icke’s Official Forums

    www.davidicke.com › … › Main Forums › Today’s News

    8 hours ago – Looks like his articles are having some impact! http://chrisspivey.org/ “Attention we have a situation…. Chris has just been arrested for …

  • Chris Spivey arrested in 2am raid | TheFlippinTruth

    theflippintruth.wordpress.com/2014/…/chrisspiveyarrested-in-2am-raid…

    6 hours ago – Chris Spivey– Intel nemesis. Brilliant writer, Chris Spivey, has beenarrested in a night-time raid on his home by the desperate powers-that-be.

  • the tap

    the-tap.blogspot.com/

    Spivey arrested at home 2am. Hi Tap,. Just after 2am this morning Chris Spivey’shome was raided by six uniformed police and he was arrested for harassment.

  • Chris was ILLEGALLY arrested with a warrant for harassment , now not being privy to the so called warrant if it’s not a wet signature and also if it’s not issued under oath it is an unlawful document and as such he has been illegally detained under false pretenses , nothing new there then .

    zRxFMo0mfvQ   Just after 2 am 6 police entered Chris’s property with a so called warrant , if he had refused they would have  forced entry (bit like our MP’s do with kids) but hey that’s ok to fuck the nation’s kids and then arrest someone for revealing it , those six (sick) so called policemen who took part in this are breaking their own oath , as no harassment or breach of the peace has or had taken place . It would seem it is easier to enter a honest man’s home and arrest him on a trumped up charge than it is to arrest the likes of Camoron , Clegg , Blair , Brittain , Mandelson (“I said a mouse not a gerbil up my ass”) along with I have my eye on you Brown (“Which eye is that said Alice looking through a glass full of shit”) and the other peados who reside in the house of shit . Not only does he have his young daughter and a 1 year old grandchild on the premises who were verbally abused by some wanker dressed in a uniform , all her possessions were rifled through and they attempted also to take her phone . Obviously after two hours of a bunch of retards who under the disguise of being up-holders of the law , who having woken the child and tried to make Chris sign for the computer stuff they had stolen , (as harassment laws do not cover electronic devices unless they are used to communicate with someone directly to cause the said harassment )  his daughter Stacey was obviously very upset , whereupon our brave boys in blue told her to “Grow up” . To the boys in blue (men in tights) when the shit hits the fan and you hear a knock it wont be half a dozen it will be 100′s if not 1000′s knocking on your door and God help you then , as the old diatribe “I was only doing my job” wont sit well when your time comes .
    Prohibition of harassment.
    (1)A person must not pursue a course of conduct—
    (a)which amounts to harassment of another, and
    (b)which he knows or ought to know amounts to harassment of the other.
    (2)For the purposes of this section, the person whose course of conduct is in question ought to know that it amounts to harassment of another if a reasonable person in possession of the same information would think the course of conduct amounted to harassment of the other.
    (3)Subsection (1) does not apply to a course of conduct if the person who pursued it shows—
    (a)that it was pursued for the purpose of preventing or detecting crime,
    (b)that it was pursued under any enactment or rule of law or to comply with any condition or requirement imposed by any person under any enactment, or
    (c)that in the particular circumstances the pursuit of the course of conduct was reasonable.
    Offence of harassment.
    (1)A person who pursues a course of conduct in breach of section 1 is guilty of an offence.
    (2)A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable on summary conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, or a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale, or both.
    Civil remedy.
    (1)An actual or apprehended breach of section 1 may be the subject of a claim in civil proceedings by the person who is or may be the victim of the course of conduct in question.
    (2)On such a claim, damages may be awarded for (among other things) any anxiety caused by the harassment and any financial loss resulting from the harassment.
    (3)Where—
    (a)in such proceedings the High Court or a county court grants an injunction for the purpose of restraining the defendant from pursuing any conduct which amounts to harassment, and
    (b)the plaintiff considers that the defendant has done anything which he is prohibited from doing by the injunction,
    the plaintiff may apply for the issue of a warrant for the arrest of the defendant.
    (4)An application under subsection (3) may be made—
    (a)where the injunction was granted by the High Court, to a judge of that court, and
    (b)where the injunction was granted by a county court, to a judge or district judge of that or any other county court.
    (5)The judge or district judge to whom an application under subsection (3) is made may only issue a warrant if—
    (a)the application is substantiated on oath, and
    (b)the judge or district judge has reasonable grounds for believing that the defendant has done anything which he is prohibited from doing by the injunction.
    (6)Where—
    (a)the High Court or a county court grants an injunction for the purpose mentioned in subsection (3)(a), and
    (b)without reasonable excuse the defendant does anything which he is prohibited from doing by the injunction,
    he is guilty of an offence.
    (7)Where a person is convicted of an offence under subsection (6) in respect of any conduct, that conduct is not punishable as a contempt of court.
    (8)A person cannot be convicted of an offence under subsection (6) in respect of any conduct which has been punished as a contempt of court.
    (9)A person guilty of an offence under subsection (6) is liable—
    (a)on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, or a fine, or both, or
    (b)on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, or a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum, or both.
    Putting people in fear of violence.
    (1)A person whose course of conduct causes another to fear, on at least two occasions, that violence will be used against him is guilty of an offence if he knows or ought to know that his course of conduct will cause the other so to fear on each of those occasions.
    (2)For the purposes of this section, the person whose course of conduct is in question ought to know that it will cause another to fear that violence will be used against him on any occasion if a reasonable person in possession of the same information would think the course of conduct would cause the other so to fear on that occasion.
    (3)It is a defence for a person charged with an offence under this section to show that—
    (a)his course of conduct was pursued for the purpose of preventing or detecting crime,
    (b)his course of conduct was pursued under any enactment or rule of law or to comply with any condition or requirement imposed by any person under any enactment, or
    (c)the pursuit of his course of conduct was reasonable for the protection of himself or another or for the protection of his or another’s property.
    (4)A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable—
    (a)on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, or a fine, or both, or
    (b)on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, or a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum, or both.
    (5)If on the trial on indictment of a person charged with an offence under this section the jury find him not guilty of the offence charged, they may find him guilty of an offence under section 2.
    (6)The Crown Court has the same powers and duties in relation to a person who is by virtue of subsection (5) convicted before it of an offence under section 2 as a magistrates’ court would have on convicting him of the offence.

    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1997/40/contents 

    To all intents and purposes the law about harassment is a Civil matter and therefore should be dealt with by a Civil court , harassment is a bit of a grey area (something akin to the lack of grey matter in plods head) and not a criminal offence and as such should be dealt with by the proper authority and the issue of a warrant is unlawful , unless a previous court order has been broken .
    Chris has just been arrested for harrassment, apparently under section 32, because he wouldn’t sign under section 23. 6 police felt the need to search his flat and Stacey and Clay’s room…. looking for cctv footage , well bad luck as you were on “Candid Camera” plod so you can deny that in court also its now safely in several different countries .
    This is harassment section 23.6   http://www.neiladdison.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/law/act.htm which refused to sign , so they arrested him under harassment section 32 http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/s_to_u/sentencing_manual/racially_or_religiously_aggravated_harassment/ which if you can find any racial or religious aggravated harassment on this site please let us know .
  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *