POLICE SCOTLAND ,PROTECTING AND SERVING WHO?

FRIDAY, 24 JANUARY 2014

POLICE SCOTLAND – JUST WHO ARE THEY PROTECTING?

I received a letter from a Scottish police officer called Neil Richardson last week.

In it he repeated the ridiculous mantra that a “thorough investigation” into Hollie`s allegations had taken place. Officer Richardson had clearly not bothered to check the facts before putting his name to such nonsense. Police evidence given on oath at my trial confirmed that not one of the 22 named alleged abusers of Hollie, whom the police have already described unequivocally as a victim, had ever been questioned, or had their computers examined, following Hollie`s statement to the police on 8th September 2009, which I witnessed. Additionally, the letter failed to address the fact that Grampian Police had withheld two crucial medical documents supporting Hollie from the Prosecutor.

The police officer who made this staggering confession in court was the one who had interviewed Hollie , DC Lisa Jane Evans. Of course, Hollie`s claims had been fully supported by a wide range of expert witness statements that are in the public domain. At the police interview, Hollie conducted herself throughout three and a half hours with astonishing courage and composure and despite her speech impediment and her recounting of horrifying ordeals, made her statements with impressive clarity and detail.

DC Evans` admission was supported by nine of those accused by Hollie, who was accepted as a truthful and competent witness, whom the prosecution had chosen to testify against me. All nine confirmed that the police had never interviewed them over Hollie`s strongly and professionally supported allegations made to DC Evans.

Significantly,the complainants against me did not include Denis and Greg Mackie, the two individuals against whom the expert evidence was overwhelmingly strong.

The nine who gave evidence in open court, with no reporting restrictions, are as follows.

Sheriff Graham Buchanan – described by Hollie to DC Evans as “a big lawyer”.

Sylvia Major – cousin of Denis Mackie, who is now scheduled to testify against Timothy Rustige at the trial on 24th February in Aberdeen, accompanied by Elish Angiolini.

Ann Royal

Ian Macdonald

Carol Low – her name was mispronounced as “Kyle” by Hollie

Jillian Mackie – Denis Mackie`s sister-in-law. At that time, she had recently been a key witness as a friend of convicted murderer Malcolm Webster at his trial.

Andrew Young – former head teacher at Beechwood Special School, where Hollie was a pupil. Mr Young blatantly perjured himself at the trial when questioned by defence QC Andy Lamb about medical reports on Hollie submitted by the school medical officer, Dr Paul Carter.

Helen Macdonald – Hollie`s former carer.

Win Dragon – also due to give evidence against Tim Rustige, along with Elish Angiolini.

Of course, none of this by itself can possibly confirm the guilt of those named. What we do know is that not one of them was even questioned by the police, let alone have their computers examined, the normal police procedure in such circumstances.

That is all.

Although this cannot be included as evidence, the police and authorities would do well to heed the words of one of Scotland`s most prominent lawyers, Peter Anderson of Simpson & Marwick, who represents both Sheriff Buchanan and Denis Mackie. Mr Anderson is adamant that Sheriff Buchanan is innocent of all allegations, but has written to me to say that he thinks Denis and Greg Mackie may well have sexually abused Hollie and that others may well have abused her too. It is good to find a lawyer in Scotland who can not only be loyal to his clients, but be brutally honest when appropriate, especially when a small disabled girl has been raped.

Returning to Officer Richardson, what was most extraordinary about the letter is that he holds the rank of Deputy Chief Constable. This means that in the absence of the Chief Constable, the women, children and disabled of Scotland will have to rely on him for their safety and protection from sexual attack.

Now, having vigorously responded to his letter in a way that you might expect, DCC Richardson can reply in two ways.

Either he can admit his mistake and accept that no adequate investigation of Hollie` claims has ever taken place that could be remotely described as “thorough”, or he can say that he does not think those accused of rape need to be questioned at all, even when the accuser`s claims are supported by extensive expert evidence. 

Again, Police Scotland, just who are you really protecting?

3 comments:

  1. How can this policeman sleep at night having sold his soul to the Devil?

    Reply

  2. From Rusty via Ally:

    Quote: Again, Police Scotland, just who are you really protecting?

    Good question Robert. Who precisely?

    To answer that question we need to take a step back and look at the excellent content of your last blog post of the 21st January: THANKS TO BILL MALONEY.

    Here’s the paragraph extract in your hand: ‘So many people, seeing the published expert witness evidence on Hollie`s case for the first time, ask me how it is possible for the police not to carry out the most basic of investigations and to even try to justify this inaction . They also ask why so few MPs or MSPs have the integrity to publicly comment or assist in this shocking case.
    The last question is easy to answer in one word – blackmail!’

    Very true – blackmail is a factor and for a variety of reasons. Simple drug or gambling addictions – even a past record. Marital adultery. Embezzlement / padding their MP expense accounts. A variety of crimes, past and present – which tend to include whoring and kiddie fiddling.

    But there are variations to the outright blackmail menace. Threats of violence or death towards oneself and / or family. The career threat of being stuck on the back benches – a non-achiever. Then there is the accolades / glittering prizes route – facilitation fees – aka ‘bribes’.

    And last but by no means least, and perhaps the most persuasive reason of all: Freemasonry. And in bonny Nonceland the Masonic ‘Speculative Society’ that hold sway over all aspects of government and officialdom’s branches: executive, legislative and judiciary – and this includes the plod squads – now reincarnated from its former corrupt satellites under the equally corrupt banner of ‘Police Nonceland’.

    And make no mistake on this score – the Masonic secret handshake club’s subjugation and mind control credo states that a blood oath Brother will do all in his power to protect a fellow Brother – including the requirement to lie and perjure themselves to protect other Masons. 
    “You must conceal all the crimes of your brother Masons, except murder and treason – and these only at your own option – and should you be summoned as a witness against a brother Mason be always sure to shield him. Falsify and keep his secrets”.

    Oh, viz the list of the Aberdeen paedo ring fingered by Hollie as her sexual abusers, it might be worth a mention to the uninitiated into the conspiratorial complexities of this entire scandal and its inherent coverup that the Sylvia Major who acted as a prosecution witness against you at your Stonehaven trial is the wife of the late Terry Major, also one of Hollie’s named abusers – and top dog fingerprint / forensics officer with the not fit for purpose Grampian Plod Squad.

    Reply

  3. Police Scotland is a disgrace.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *