New child sex abuse inquiry head ‘no intention’ of scaling back work

New child sex abuse inquiry head ‘no intention’ of scaling back work

The new head of the independent
inquiry into child sexual abuse has defended the embattled probe and
insisted it will not be scaled back.

Professor
Alexis Jay admitted its scale and scope were a “substantial challenge”
but stressed she would not seek to revise nor reduce the terms of
reference.

Last month Dame
Lowell Goddard became the third chairwoman to quit the inquiry, which
has been beset by problems since it was launched in 2014.

Professor Alexis Jay admitted the inquiry's scale and scope were a "substantial challenge"

Professor Alexis Jay admitted the inquiry’s scale and scope were a “substantial challenge”

Earlier this week Dame Lowell, a
New Zealand High Court judge, delivered a critical assessment of the
inquiry – saying there was an “inherent problem” in its “sheer scale
and size” and calling for a “complete review”.

Meanwhile,
one survivors’ group has said it may pull out of the inquiry because it
does not believe it is “truly independent”, citing concerns about the
involvement of the Home Office.

The
sweeping probe has been described as the most ambitious public inquiry
ever in England and Wales. It was earmarked to take five years, but
there have been suggestions it could run for as long as a decade.

In
a letter to the inquiry’s core participants, Prof Jay wrote: “Its
scale and scope are a substantial challenge, but the panel and I are
absolutely committed to delivering results with pace, confidence and
clarity.”

Prof Jay, who
previously led an inquiry into child sexual exploitation in Rotherham,
went on: “I would like to reassure any victim or survivor who is
concerned that their experience may be excluded from our work that I
have no intention of asking the Home Secretary to revise or reduce our
terms of reference.

“I am
confident that we can adapt our working methods to make our task more
manageable and to progress with our work more quickly.”

On her second day as chair she ordered an internal review of the inquiry’s approach to its investigations.
She
said: “My aim is to explore new ways to deliver the inquiry’s
investigative work while remaining faithful to its terms of reference.

“I
will write to you again when the review process has concluded to tell
you about any changes that we propose to make and to invite your views.”

Prof
Jay referred to criticism “that too many of our staff come from the
Home Office”, saying: “In fact, less than a quarter of our staff are
formerly from the Home Office.

“Their duty and loyalty is to the inquiry and not to any government department.
“Regardless
of their background, the inquiry staff are bound together by a
commitment to make this inquiry a success, drawing on skills and
expertise from the public and private sectors.”

She said it was an “operational challenge to mount an inquiry of this magnitude”, but insisted: “We are making progress.”

Dame Lowell Goddard called for a complete review, claiming the inquiry budget does not match its "sheer scale and size"

Dame Lowell Goddard called for a complete review, claiming the inquiry budget does not match its “sheer scale and size”

from Blogger http://ift.tt/2cw4Txx
via IFTTT

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *