MARTYN SEES DEAD PEOPLE

MARTYNS ORDER OF TRUTH THINKS EVIDENCE IS NO EVIDENCE AND NO EVIDENCE IS EVIDENCE!

Order Of Truth January 3, 2014 at 8:25 am Reply

Instead of playing silly games, IF you have any REAL evidence – show it. Because so far, all we have seen and heard are people making claims with no hard evidence to back them up. It would be interesting to see information which is substantially robust enough to consider there is any credibility to the claims Hollie was abused by some paedophile ring.
There is a reasonable challenge which must be easy to take up. Send us the evidence.

  • What do you call 13000 UK pounds on compensation for the criminal injury of RAPE of a child.
    Is that not a good place to start Martyn?

  • Perhaps this is where there is some confusion over why Hollie was paid an award.
    If you look at the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority procedures for considering cases, then it is really clear why they decided to make this payment. It does not mean that an offence occurred or that there was a perpetrator of any offence.
    It is not like a court of law where an offence has to be proven and a perpetrator found or convicted. Taken from the CICA: “We decide cases on what is called the ‘balance of probabilities’. This means that our decision is based on what is more likely to have happened than not have happened. We do not need to have something proved ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’.”
    It seems that the award was made primarily because of the forensic medical report of Dr Frances Kelly which stated there was evidence of previous penetration but there was no evidence of how this occurred, by whom if anyone other than Hollie, or the time period over which this may have occurred. The investigating officer and others at the time were of the opinion that Hollie had possibly been the victim of penetrative sexual abuse at some time in the past. This has never been proven or a perpetrator identified.
    So the award Hollie received was not because a crime had taken place, but that the CICA considered that on balance it was more probable than not.
    There seems to have been this fantasy that Hollie was awarded £13,000 because something definite happened (which is understandable) going around the internet propagated by Green as ‘evidence’. IF people took the time to look into these things themselves and not just take other people’s word for their claims then perhaps the whole real story would emerge. Everything is this post is verifiable EVIDENCE – not conjecture, presumption, or opinion, and you can find it for yourself quite easily.

  • We see you are moderating comments now Martyn.
    What do you call £13000 criminal compensation for the
    RAPE of a wee girl?
    The cops think she was abused so Does Mark Daly and several professionals,whit are you wanting polaroids?

  • Perhaps this is where there is some confusion over why Hollie was paid an award.
    Lullluzzz and this from a man that believes in the supernatural yet demands proof from Hollie,who has told the same story for years ,who has no motive to lie and has evidence and proof she was criminally assaulted.
    .
  • SILLY GAMES MARTYN !

    WHAT DO YOU CALL HARVESTING  IP ADDRESSES !

    ATTEMPTED  INTIMIDATION FROM THE HOAX TEAM

    YOU STAND AGAINST A WEE GIRL THAT WAS RAPED AND ON THE SIDE OF THE CORRUPT SCOTTISH ESTABLISHMENT WHO CONTINUE TO COVER IT UP,WHY WOULD THEY COVER IT UP?

     

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *