Tonia said…
N. Johnson said…
I’ve been to Anna’s blog. She is okay, she has a lot of supporters. A few who doubt her own account, but mostly supporters. By the way, she wasn’t at Duncroft when the abuses happened in the 70’s. She has never said that. She only discredited Bebe Roberts account of the 60’s, which she did fine. She also made some mistaske in her account. She said Miss Jone wasn’t at Duncroft in 1094 (she was) she said Merion Jones didn’t mention his connection to Duncroft and Miss Jones (him being her nephew and all), which was quite the opposite. He never tried to hide it, but said it himself. But she did a fine job overall, like a good lawyer should do.
“I would call this a set-up simply because Susanne Nundy has a history. Wherever there is a story of abuse by officials, especially when it relates to children or paedophilia, up pops a swathe of names including Anna Raccoon, Susanne Nundy or under her maiden name Susanne Cameron-Blackie , all ready to ‘assist’, yet strangely the outcome is never the one that those originally abused, or their campaigners envisaged. More often than not they are ripped apart, labelled as nutters and thrown to the pack in the manner we saw with her post about Andrew Withers yesterday. Its almost as if she is a professional Trojan Horse.
Read more at PJC Journal http://parker-joseph.com/pjcjournal/2011/04/16/anna-raccoon-taken-at-face-value/