- IF THIS IS TRUE,WHY WOULD THE HOLLIE CASE NOT BE TRUE?
- Posts: 7557
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 9:08 am
- Location: Next door
Upload to Disclose.tv
Savile isn’t the only obnoxious paedophile being covered up by the system. Thomas Hamilton.
Posted on 25 October 2013 by admin
Sir Fixed it for Jim
How did Jim fix it so that his child abuse was never examined?
Everybody now seems to have known about it so why was nothing done about it?
Did whistleblowers try to get the authorities to act? Or were they put off by his obvious power and influence?
The initial rumours suggested that only one police force, the Surrey Constabulary had investigated an allegation of abuse against Savile in the 1970s, which could not be substantiated.
But then other tales began to emerge about victims of Savile’s abuse being interviewed, but nothing further happening because of who the allegations were against. There are also accounts of victims not complaining because of the prospect of not being believed, due to the power of the alleged abuser.
I find these stories credible. Sir James Winston Vincent Savile, OBE, KCSG was a powerful and influential man, a friend of royalty, world and religious leaders, whereas his victims were mainly children of the opposite sex who were poles apart from Savile in terms of status within the establishment. To me this would explain how hundreds could be criminally assaulted without any action being taken by the forces of law and order.
Although we are all supposed to be equal under the law my experience is that the great and good, titled and influential people, will be treated deferentially by most people including the police and politicians.
I believe most people know this and an ordinary Jane or Joe would be loath to make allegations against the great and good due to the knowledge that those who would assess their complaints would be (either consciously or sub-consciously) biased against a commoner.
In addition to the class/power differential between accuser and accused there is another aspect that prevents complainants coming forward: The fear that a victim of abuse might not be believed can be compounded if/when that victim, damaged by such abuse, goes on to become involved in self-harm, drug abuse, or other crimes. As an addict/criminal, the damaged child could then be portrayed as being unreliable as a truthful witness.
Such fears have been described by the victims of Savile’s abuse and have echoes in the Dunblane tragedy and the charmed life led by Thomas Hamilton.
At the Dunblane Public Inquiry that followed the mass murder of children at Dunblane Primary School the evidence of one anonymous victim of Thomas Hamilton’s sexual abuse on board his cabin cruiser, (Hamilton had two boats the large cabin cruiser, Tropical Linda and the smaller speed boat Lady Sheila, both said to have been bought from the police at unrealistically low prices), at Loch Lomond was traduced by the Lord Advocate’s representative LINK to such an extent that Lord Cullen in his Report concluded that he ” did not find this allegation to have been proved” LINK and in effect allowed Thomas Hamilton to be considered to have been a decent man, with no proven history of sexual abuse!
This revisionism had the effect of giving a post mortem character reference for Thomas Hamilton, signed by Lord Cullen, despite the fact that his abuse of boys at his Loch Lomond camps was well known and had been reported to the police. These and other incidents had made him known to half the police forces in Scotland and had seen him dismissed from the Scout movement.
So to disbelieve disturbed children – who have been damaged by sexual abuse – about the details of the abuse that caused them to be damaged, would appear to be part of a vicious circle of protection for abusers.
“Who would believe you? You are damaged goods!” was probably spoken by Hamilton and Savile to silence any prospective complainants.
The discrediting of the anonymous statement from the abused boy, now a man, of abuse, continued at the Dunblane Public Inquiry, which also discounted his evidence of having fired real bullets from rifles at a hut in Dunblane, that may have been the indoor shooting range at Queen Victoria School. Lord Cullen did not even mention this aspect of evidence in his report.
Lord Cullen did, however, see fit to inform the public in his Report published in September 1996, that the anonymous witness was jailed in August 1996…. a month after the Inquiry closed.
Such scenarios as those highlighted above might seem fanciful to some, but I have personal experience of one aspect. That is: how the establishment can turn a blind eye to allegations of sexual abuse when they come from an ordinary citizen and might implicate the rich and famous; the influential ones at the heart of our establishment.
Allegations of child abuse at a school are brought to my attention.
My one and only experience of reporting child abuse began in 2003 when I was put in contact with Glenn Harrison (The Housemaster), a school teacher in Shetland at that time, who had been a house master in charge of about 60 boys between 11 and 15 years of age at Queen Victoria School, Dunblane between the summer of 1989 and December 1991.
The Housemaster knew of my interest in freemasonry as I was petitioning the Scottish parliament at the time to have judges and sheriffs make declarations of any secret societies -such as the Masons- that they belonged to. LINK I also knew of his claims from an anonymous Internet article.
The Housemaster told me of how, in about 1990, he believed boys from his then school were being bullied by their peers at the school and sexually abused, both at the school and away from the school. He told me the latter was done by a clique of paedophiles connected with the school (teachers etc. and their friends) and another group of “toffs” who visited the school and took carefully targeted boys away for weekends.
The Housemaster and his wife lived in a flat at the school which was immediately above the main entrance and he said that in the evening they would see big fancy cars (sometimes chauffeur driven and displaying pennants, and badges of office) arrive with well known faces of politicians, judges and other celebrities who, when he enquired as to who they were, and what they were doing, was given the answer that these people were “Friends of QVS” who were taking certain boys out for a treat.
The Housemaster was not comfortable with this situation, which was done, ostensibly at least, for charitable reasons, and he knew the people were influential as some of these strangers he saw were often the same people he and his wife had just seen on the TV News.
The Housemaster told me of how he noticed that certain boys had been taken away for weekends by the “Friends of QVS” and would return to the school in a distressed state, but flush with money. He also told me of hearing noises in the night and on investigating found used condoms in the dormitories.
What also troubled The Housemaster was finding strangers wandering about in the school, in dormitories and other areas which should have been off limits to all but staff and pupils. He complained about this but was again told that these people were “Friends of QVS”.
As a comparative new-boy among the staff The Housemaster felt powerless to influence what appeared to be long established practices at the school. He felt that he was an outsider in many ways in a military school where bullying of younger boys by their older peers was considered a rite of passage.
The Housemaster did not accept the regime at the school which he considered to be at odds with his duties of acting in “loco parentis”. His criticism of the practices at play in the school led to him being seen as a troublesome meddler by his longer serving colleagues and he felt that this growing ostracism was compounded by the fact that he was a non-Mason in a school that was dominated by what he called “Free Masons”.
A teacher helps his pupil flee the school.
The Housemaster said things got so bad that one boy who was a target of the bullies ran away and with The Housemaster’s help hid out in the school grounds until his father – a serviceman in Germany who The Housemaster had contacted – could come and collect his son and take him out of the school.
A staff member helping his own pupils escape from their boarding school seemed almost unbelievable to me. However that was just one of several horrific things related to me by The Housemaster, which among others included stories of one boy trying to hang himself after being abused.
The Housemaster told me that he had taken his suspicions of abuse to Central Scotland police at their Stirling HQ, but they told him that the school was an MOD establishment, and as such was covered by the Official Secrets Act and was outwith their locus. He also went to the social works department of Central Regional Council, but they were equally unhelpful suggesting it was a matter for the police.
The Housemaster said that he continually suggested changes to protect his charges. This was done by way of memos and he also kept a log of events such as unauthorised persons on site etc, but relations got so bad between him, the headmaster, and the brigadier of the school that he tendered the one-term’s notice of his resignation that his contract required. This was on the last day of the summer term of 1991 (19th June).
On his return after the summer break The Housemaster said he continued with his duties and on 11th December 1991 he wrote to the parents of every one of his 57 house charges telling them their children were in danger due to the bullying and abuse that was endemic at the school. He gave them the phone number of Esther Rantzen’s “Childline” and urged the parents to contact it.
The Housemaster explained to me that he hoped that when an investigation was instigated as a result of this drastic action he could then broaden his allegations to sexual abuse which he was sure had taken place, but had not been witnessed by him.
According to The Housemaster his letter-writing caused a complete breakdown in his relations with the school’s leaders and with just a week of his contract remaining he felt physically threatened by several incidents, including a stone being thrown at his window and the attitude of the school brigadier. Because of this he reported the incident to the police at Dunblane and then went into Stirling. While he was there – he later found out – the police smashed the door of his flat down with a sledgehammer and removed some of his personal belongings and cash.
In his ransacked apartment he found a letter from the headmaster on the floor instructing him to leave the school immediately. The bursar of the school and a policeman arrived and stayed with him while he packed his belongings into a suitcase. He was asked to accompany the policeman to Dunblane police station where he was interviewed for about an hour by an inspector from Stirling and detectives brought from Edinburgh before being allowed to leave.
Ex-housemaster continues his campaign to highlight abuse.
The Housemaster told me how, after leaving Dunblane, he got a job in the northernmost school in the British Isles. While teaching at Baltasound over the next three years he exhausted every possible avenue in a bid to have the practices at his former school investigated.
He said his actions did succeed in getting an in-house review carried out by education authorities, which was published, and questions raised in parliament, but he felt that he had failed in his attempts to highlight the culture of bullying and abuse at Queen Victoria School, and consequently had failed to remedy it. The Housemaster said he did not consider the review to be anything other than a housekeeping exercise as it did not involve him or the parents and in fact he did not even receive a copy of the final report of findings.
The Housemaster said he had exhausted himself in his efforts to bring about change to his old school. He had written to the Duke of Edinburgh, Esthter Rantzen, the Secretary of State for Scotland, his MP, petitioned the European Parliament, all to no avail.
A Friend of QVS, Thomas Hamilton, appears on TV.
The Housemaster said he was resigned to getting on with his life when in 1996 he switched on the TV at his home in Unst Shetland and saw the face of Thomas Hamilton the Dunblane mass murderer, who The Housemaster immediately recognised as one of the “Friends of QVS” and a close friend of another housemaster, Ben Philip who lived in the flat below him at the school.
The Housemaster then said his feelings of failure were compounded as he felt that if he had somehow managed to have the school and its inadequacies investigated thoroughly, then Thomas Hamilton may have been prevented from going on to carry out his murders in the other Dunblane school.
The Housemaster told me that he waited for the phone to ring as there must be an investigation into Thomas Hamilton’s activities at all the schools he was connected with, and the police must surely want to interview him. Lord Cullen (who would soon become the senior commissioner at Queen Victoria School) called many witnesses but not The Housemaster.
The Housemaster now wanted me to help him get his story told.
Face to face with The Housemaster.
I had listened to much of this harrowing story in detail over the telephone and it lasted for several nights. The story had the ring of truth to it, but before I would agree to help him I needed to see him face to face to assure myself he was genuine, so I travelled to Unst and spoke to him in person. We talked for hours going over his story and there was no doubt in my mind that he genuinely believed what he had told me to be the truth.
Though he had never personally witnessed boys being sexually abused he was sure it had happened to boys at the school.
The Housemaster gave me a contemporaneous dossier he had compiled while he was at the school, with his commentary and drawings depicting what he saw as the problems at the school. This contained correspondence including the letters he wrote to the parents of his house pupils. The Housemaster stated that much of his writings were missing as some had been taken when the Central Scotland Police had broken into his flat at the school and taken his belongings.
The dossier also contained his post-school efforts to have the affair investigated further.
After having determined that The Housemaster was truthful, I was in the position whereby I had a duty to act on what he had told me, but first I decided to try to establish if there was any corroboration of his main claims.
Investigating The Housemaster claims hits a brick wall with Westminster politicians.
My priority was to establish the veracity or otherwise of the claims made to me by The Housemaster, and as a first step write to those legally responsible for the safety and well being of the pupils in a private boarding school, the board of governors, which in this case of Queen Victoria School were Her Majesty’s Commissioners. The head commissioner is an ex-officio post held by the Secretary of State for Scotland.
I wrote to my MP, the late Rachel Squire and asked her to ask the then Secretary of State, Mrs Helen Liddell (Baroness Liddell of Coatdyke), if she was aware of any group such as the “Friends of QVS” that The Housemaster had told me about.
My MP was reluctant to help and asked me for further information so I elaborated on the story that The Housemaster had told me about Thomas Hamilton having a presence at the school and how I was researching this story to establish if there was any truth in it as I intended to use it as evidence in support my petition PE 306.
Despite being aware that The Housemaster had given me credible anecdotal evidence of child abuse and claimed that Thomas Hamilton was one of a group known as the “Friends of QVS”, my MP would not take on my concerns and suggested I contact the Secretary of State directly.
I replied to my MP stressing the seriousness of the allegations made by The Housemaster and copied the letter to the then Secretary of State, Mrs Helen Liddell. By a return e-mail I was told by Mrs Liddell that this had nothing to do with her, as the matters I had raised “are devolved to the Scottish Parliament” and my letter had been forwarded to my MSP Scott Barrie! LINK
I responded to the Secretary of State’s “palming-off” of my enquiry to my MSP by pointing out that she could not shirk her responsibilities as a Chief of Her Majesty’s Commissioners, which were invested in her by Royal Warrant, and in any case her claim that these matters were now devolved could not be considered as devolved matters, as they related to events that pre-dated devolution.
A reply to my letter was eventually sent to me by the Head of Home & Social Division of the Scotland Office who stated that the Secretary of State’s role at QVS was “purely formal” and I should write to the Chief Executive/Headmaster of QVS.
I also wrote to other Secretaries of State who were in office around the time of Glenn Harrison’s allegations. Michael Forsyth (Baron Forsyth of Drumlean who we now know had written a memo to John Major the day after the shootings at Dunblane about having the “right judge” to handle the inquiry), LINK palmed me off in the same way that Helen Liddell had done LINK.
However the RT HON Lord Lang of Monkton, DL, who was Secretary of State for Scotland at the time, of the allegations did respond. He said he had an honorary role (President he thought) as a commissioner and had paid one visit to the school between 1991 and 1995. He also said he may have appointed commissioners, but knew nothing about any alleged incidents LINK.
I later realised that Malcolm Rifkind was also a Secretary of State for Scotland between 11 January 1986 – 28 November 1990 and wrote to him, but his response was the same as his colleagues. LINK
I may have asked Mr Rifkind a supplementary question in addition to the three that I had asked the other commissioners as I was aware that his friend and election agent, Robert Bell, had known Thomas Hamilton and had sold him guns and ammunition from his gun shop in Stirling over a number of years. LINK
I found the attitude and ignorance of matters that were on the record in Hansard (Glenn Harrison’s complaints of bullying and abuse at QVS), as well as in the school records and the police log at Dunblane, by the four Secretaries of State for Scotland, puzzling to say the least.
All were senior commissioners at QVS on warrant of Her Majesty the Queen with the responsibility that goes with that role, yet none seemed to know anything about Thomas Hamilton’s influence, or Glenn Harrison’s allegations of bullying and abuse, at QVS.
In order that Alistair Darling, the current Secretary of State (13 June 2003 5 May 2006) was aware of the ignorance and inaction of his predecessors I wrote to him after I had made my police complaint. LINK
Politicians didn’t want to know so perhaps Her Majesty’s Commissioner might?
As it was obvious that the politicians at the head of the pyramid of those with a duty of care for the pupils of QVS, the Presidents of Her Majesty’s Commissioners, past and present, wanted nothing to do with the allegations regarding the presence of Thomas Hamilton, or the alleged abuse of boys at the school, I decided to write to all of the commissioners who had been in office at the time of The Housemaster’s allegations.
I also wrote to the Patron of the school, HRH The Duke of Edinburgh, and the headmaster at the time of the allegations, also Lord Cullen and Lord George Roberson, who The Housemaster had repeatedly stated, were visitors to the school during his time there.
The list of commissioners I wrote to was like a who’s who of the great and good in the military establishment. My first letter simply and politely asked the commissioners what, if anything they knew of a group entitled the “Friends of QVS”?
Commissioners: We know nothing about Thomas Hamilton or allegations of abuse and bullying.
The first question I asked was a simple one, but it did not get a good response, so I wrote a second letter increasing my questions to three, so that the recipients were given an idea of just how serious the matters I enquired about were.
Again polite letters were written asking the commissioners, what, if anything, they knew of:
Thomas Hamilton’s presence and influence at the school.
A group called the “Friends of QVS” who would take boys away for weekends.
Allegations that bullying and abuse of pupils took place by pupils at the school and others.
The answers from those who responded to my letters were overwhelmingly in the negative. No one knew of a group called the “Friends of QVS”. No one knew of Thomas Hamilton at the school.
One or two knew of allegations of bullying (but not abuse) that had been addressed by the authorities and the police.
The thing that struck me most was that some of the commissioners I wrote the second letter to phoned me at home, not to answer my three questions, but to see how much I knew about the affair.
Ten minutes on the internet reveals the presence and influence of Thomas Hamilton at QVS.
I decided to search the transcript of the Dunblane Inquiry to see if there were any references to Thomas Hamilton being a visitor to QVS and it took five minutes to download the file from the government website and five minutes to convert to a searchable Adobe file and enter Victoria as the search term. This resulted in 13 instances of Victoria and of them five were about the Queen Victoria School, and of the five three showed that Thomas Hamilton was indeed a frequent and influential figure at QVS.LINK
The first to speak of QVS at the Dunblane Inquiry was Grace Jones Ogilvie a neighbour of Hamilton’s who told, under oath, of Thomas Hamilton taking his boy’s club camping at Loch Lomondside and at Queen Victoria School.
The second person to speak of QVS at the Dunblane Inquiry was Ian Steven Boal a young undergraduate friend of Thomas Hamilton who told, under oath, of Thomas Hamilton fixing him up with a job at a summer school at Queen Victoria School.
The third person to speak of QVS at the Dunblane Inquiry was Robert Mark Ure who was not a friend of Thomas Hamilton, but who lived across the road from him told, under oath, that his estranged wife had told him she had been on the firing range at Queen Victoria School with her friend Thomas Hamilton.
I was astonished by these references to Hamilton at Queen Victoria School as they quite clearly corroborated The Housemaster story and showed that Her Majesty’s Commissioners either didn’t know what was going on at the school they were charged with governing, or they were being less than truthful with me.
So from three independent witnesses’ evidence to the Dunblane Inquiry it was possible to establish that Thomas Hamilton took his youth-clubs camping within the 45-acre grounds; fixed it for a friend to work as a teacher at a summer school, and took another friend shooting at the army firing range (where the school cadet force practice with heavy weapons including British Army Sten guns) of Queen Victoria School.
Another surprising fact that jumped out at me when reading the transcript of the Dunblane Inquiry was the fact that the four people who I considered key to any examination of Thomas Hamilton– his Masonic grandfather, a man who had been considered his father for most of his life, the Chief Constable of Central Scotland Police (which had repeatedly granted Hamilton firearms licences), the Chief Executive of Central Scotland Council, which had over many years allowed Hamilton to run boy’s clubs in the area, and the owner of the gun shop in Stirling that had supplied Hamilton with guns and ammunition, weeks before the massacre–were not called as witnesses to give evidence to the inquiry.
These key players in the life of Thomas Hamilton were allowed to give statements and avoid cross-examination. Their evidence was given as hear-say by others and taken as read.
Checking out The Housemaster’s story about the police smashing down the door to his house.
The dossier that The Housemaster gave me in Shetland contained a copy of a letter from Sir William Kennedy Reid, CB, Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration (The Ombudsman) confirming the fact that the police were called to the school on 13 December and broke down the door of his flat, but declining to intervene as the police are excluded from the list of public bodies that he may investigate.
Confirmation of the police breaking down the door to The Housemaster’s flat also appears in a letter dated 1993 from the school headmaster, Julian D. Hankinson, to The Housemaster in which the headmaster denies the school instructed the police to do this, and avers that the decision to break down the door of The Housemaster’s home was taken by Central Scotland Police.
Checking out The Housemaster’s story about making complaints about bullying and abuse.
Hansard records in 1993 that the Scottish Office’s Chief Inspector of Schools had carried out an investigation arising out of The Housemaster’s 1991 allegations of bullying and as a consequence of their findings they had initiated changes to the school’s procedures.
The Housemaster’s correspondence also contains a copy of a 1993 letter from Sir William Kennedy Reid, CB, Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration (The Ombudsman) confirming his allegations of bullying and declining representations from Jim Wallace MP to intervene further in The Housemaster’s complaint as the Chief Inspector of Schools had acted on The Housemaster’s allegations and instituted changes to procedures as a result of this, following his department’s investigation.
Further confirmation of the investigation by the Chief Inspector of Schools arising out of The Housemaster’s complaint appeared in the Scottish newspapers when the report was published in 1992, though the terms of the report are restricted to bullying and as with Hansard and The Ombudsman, The Housemaster’s allegations of abuse (as well as bullying) contained in his letter to the parents of 57 boys are omitted.
Not easy to establish the Masonic link at QVS.
The Housemaster’s allegations of a Masonic clique at the school were, like his allegations of abuse, not as clear as his allegations of bullying. I did not find this surprising, as sexual abuse, if it is not witnessed personally presents any whistleblower with a daunting prospect by claiming it openly.
Masonry is thought by many observers to have been the means by which Hamilton had led a charmed life LINK, but it is also a tricky subject to deal with and that is why The Housemaster said he hinted at it in his contemporaneous drawings, by cryptic reference to F. Mason etc., but he did not feel confident enough to openly take on the Masonic allegation until after he saw Thomas Hamilton on TV.
I know this is his position as I asked him about this specifically when I met up with him and he also told me that he was so convinced of the presence of Masonic influence at the school that he asked his MP, Jim Wallace to declare any interest in this regard. He told me then, that he was not given the assurances that he sought from Jim Wallace despite repeated requests.
As someone who has campaigned for a register of Masonic membership by decision makers I could empathise with the quandary The Housemaster found himself faced with. Nevertheless I did write to the Grand Lodge of Free and Antient Masons in Edinburgh in a bid to establish if any of those that The Housemaster maintained were Masons, were in fact in the Craft, but not surprisingly the secretive organisation do not give membership details of “gentlemen who are living”.
So while I was unable to prove The Housemaster’s allegation that Masonic influence had played a part in the strange goings on at Queen Victoria School, I believed him when he said that he knew of several colleagues – including his neighbour and Thomas Hamilton’s friend Ben Philip – who were Masons and had been convinced that freemasonry was prevalent in the school.
In short I was satisfied that he had expressed this belief before the Dunblane Massacre, and was not party to the anti-Masonic sentiment that had sprung up after that event.
That the freemasons were interested in what The Housemaster had to say was apparent. He phoned me to tell me that Lord Burton, a past Grand Master Mason of Scotland, had left a message on his telephone answering machine wishing to speak to him. He asked my advice on this and I said that I thought that he should speak to Burton.
Following this contact an astonishing newspaper article appeared entitled “Who are they trying to protect”, which covered much of what The Housemaster had told me. This was the first time to my knowledge that The Housemaster’s experiences at Queen Victoria School had appeared in the mainstream media, though one of his letters to the Duke of Edinburgh had been on the Internet. LINK
Lord Burton knew of my contact with The Housemaster and he phoned me and wrote to me several times and we had an exchange of views. I found him to be a pleasant, and I believe a decent man, but he was over-keen to protect his organisation and blamed the Speculative Society clique in the judiciary, and the police for a cover up “at the highest level” of the Dunblane tragedy. He told me that a Scots Tory Law Lord and member of the Speculative Society had pounded his fist on his desk in the House of Lords to emphasise that he [Burton] should let the matter [Dunblane] drop.
So while I was unable to substantiate The Housemaster’s allegations regarding Masonic influence I was prepared to believe – based on my experiences of the generally corrosive influence of freemasonry – that he was correct.
The Housemaster’s horror story is largely confirmed and is credible so what next?
Having established – to my satisfaction at least – the veracity of most of what The Housemaster had told me, and finding him to be a credible person who would not invent tales of sexual abuse that he was convinced had happened to pupils of Queen Victoria School, Dunblane, I had a duty to bring this matter to the attention of the proper authorities.
I compiled a file containing a written narrative of the allegations and my enquiries into them and copies of all the details The Housemaster had given me, plus my own correspondence, and made a file of it to give to the proper authorities to investigate. LINK
The problem was who were the proper authorities to take it to?
I was reluctant to take it in the first instance to the police force which had failed to act on The Housemaster’s allegations at the time and instead had broken down his door. They were, in effect, part of the problem rather than the solution.
I was also reluctant to take it to the school or the commissioners who were either in ignorance or denial of the event that I wished them to investigate. Like the police they seemed to be part of the problem rather than the solution.
As I had originally attracted The Housemaster’s attention because of my involvement in campaigning for transparency in the justice system by petitioning the Scottish Parliament I thought that this would be a good place to put his concerns about Queen Victoria School “on the record”.
The Scottish Parliament airbrushes The Housemaster’s allegations from the records along with two meetings of the Justice 2 Committee!
When my petition PE 306 – calling for decision makers in the justice system to register membership of secret societies – had been with the Scottish Parliament for almost three years the Justice 2 Committee, who were considering it, wrote and asked me to give examples of cases where there was a belief that freemasonry had been at play. I confirmed I would give five examples and was asked to provide this information before their meeting with the Justice Minister, Jim Wallace, on 4th March. They said they would discuss the matter with him, and then again consider it at their next meeting of 18th March 2003.LINK
This gave me the chance to have The Housemaster’s experiences published as part of my written submission, but to my astonishment not only was this normal practice not adhered to, the two meetings at which the Justice Committee considered my submissions was expunged from the record.
A researcher visiting the archives of events at the Scottish Parliament would not know that two meetings to consider my petition PE 306 had even taken place on the these dates, and would simply see my petition ending it’s life on 28th January 2003. LINK
This is how this came about. In response to the committee’s invitation I cited four cases in addition to my own case – which had spawned the petition – where there was a perception that Masonic bias may influence judicial proceedings.
One of the four other cases was the Dunblane Public Inquiry, where there was a belief among many, including myself, that freemasonry had been a factor in the charmed life led by Thomas Hamilton.
This belief was evidenced by the astonishing fact that he had been repeatedly granted a firearms licence and access to schools to run youth clubs, despite the fact that he was know and suspected of child abuses by police forces throughout Central Scotland.
The lack of any attempt to examine the possibility that freemasonry explained these anomalies and the fact that productions gathered for the Inquiry had been the subject of a non-statutory 100-year closure by the Inquiry judge Lord Cullen meant that the Dunblane Inquiry was seen by many as a whitewash.
I concluded my written submissions regarding the Dunblane Inquiry by reference to the case of The Housemaster at Queen Victoria School, as it was linked to the inquiry by witness’s evidence of Thomas Hamilton’s presence there.
The Justice 2 committee however, after promising to publish my submissions, or if they would not admit some aspects on legal advice, advise me of the reason why, decided that they would dismiss my petition and would not as promised publish them. This was done without giving me any reasons why other than stating: “they may be defamatory”.
To show that the matters I put to the committee were not of a defamatory nature I have published them here LINK.They consist of matters that are either in the public domain or were soon to be as matters of public interest. Not only that, most of what I claimed had already been in the newspapers.
While it was unusual for a petitioner’s submissions not to be published – even in a redacted form – it is unique and extraordinary that two Justice 2 committee meetings, one of which was attended by the Justice Minister, Jim Wallace, to consider a public petition dealing with declarations of freemasonry and membership of the Speculative Society in the judiciary to be expunged from the record as if they had never been.
Fortunately I kept the transcripts of the official reports of all of the committee meetings that considered my public petition PE 306 on file which can be seen here. LINK
Could the reference to Queen Victoria School have been the reason for this draconian censorship?
Or could the Justice Minister’s relaxed view of our judge’s membership of the Masons or the Speculative Society have been the cause of the censor’s red pencil?
My attempts to highlight The Housemaster’s allegations through the Scottish Parliament had failed.
Parliament didn’t want to know but would the judiciary be interested in The Housemaster’s story?
I had been alerted to the existence of the Speculative Society while researching my petition PE 306. It is an exclusive all-male group prominent in the judiciary. By reference to a vanity publication for the members of the society I was able to establish that over two thirds of our Law Lords were undeclared members. I made this information available to many, and one person who was interested in my findings was Robbie the Pict, an anti-road toll campaigner who had been involved in several cases involving the Skye Bridge.
At around the same time as my petition Robbie the Pict secured a hearing in the Court of Session before a bench headed by Lord Gill, the Lord Justice Clerk (now Lord President), alleging that undeclared membership of the Spec had prejudiced his court cases. LINK
I sat in the public gallery and noted with interest that at one stage when Mr Pict read from his 44-page back-up papers, he made reference to the Dunblane Inquiry and the fact that “Hamilton had also been reported to the police by a member of staff as tampering with children at Queen Victoria School shooting club in Dunblane.”
At this reference to Queen Victoria School Lord Gill’s head jerked upright as if he had been jabbed with a cattle prod. He immediately adjourned the proceedings on the basis that he was a Commissioner of the school, so would have to confer with his colleagues before proceeding further.
After an adjournment of about ten minutes, Lord Gill and his bench returned and he asked Mr Pict if he was satisfied to have Lord Gill continue to hear him on the understanding that he (Lord Gill) had a declared interest in Queen Victoria School as an ex-officio commissioner. Mr Pict agreed and the hearing continued.
This declaration confirmed to me that Lord Gill was a conscientious commissioner and a fair man, so I wrote to him asking if he would accept my evidence of The Housemaster’s allegations of sexual and physical abuse of pupils at the school, and instigate an independent inquiry into them.
Lord Gill agreed to my request and appeared to take my written submissions seriously, but after a while he came back to me suggesting that he put the matters to the present commissioners at Queen Victoria School for their investigation.
The suggestion that some of the same commissioners, who had allowed Thomas Hamilton access to the school, be allowed to investigate themselves, was not something that I welcomed, as they were seen by me – like the police – as part of the problem rather than the solution.
I declined Lord Gill’s offer.
Would the Crown Office & Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS) investigate The Housemaster’s claims?
In Scotland, The Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS) is responsible for the prosecution of crime usually following reports from the police. However COPFS are also responsible for the investigation of complaints against the police.
The Housemaster’s story made allegations against the “toffs” who took boys from the school, the school authorities, some of the older pupils, and the police who broke down the door of his home and took his possessions. So I thought they might be the relevant body to approach.
The head of COPFS is the Lord Advocate, at the relevant time, Colin Boyd, but he had refused me access or knowledge of the Dunblane Inquiry documents – held under a non-statutory 100-year closure – when I had asked to see them in connection with reference to Queen Victoria School.
The 100-year closure was partially lifted some time later after much public disquiet was aired but the documents released were uninteligible. I did inspect some at Register House and information that was freely available from the transcript of the inquiry had been redacted to such an extent that they were useless in establishing the schools or other venues at which Hamilton had held his clubs. LINK
Given the Lord Advocates intransigence I decided not to go to him, but to the Solicitor General, Elish Angiolini for help.
I was aware that simply writing to the Solicitor General by name was unlikely to reach her desk so decided that in a matter of some importance such as this I would deliver my complaint by Messenger at Arms and by so doing ensure that the complaint was taken seriously.
My attempts to elicit a serious response from Elish Angiolini (nee McPhilomy), the Solicitor General for Scotland were of little effect as she simply refused to accept them from the Messenger at Arms, but did advise me to go to the police despite the fact that she knew The Housemaster’s complaint was, in part, about the police, and their failure to act, before acting maliciously.
Nowhere else to go to but the Central Scotland Police.
Having exhausted every avenue I could think of to bring The Housemaster’s allegations to the attention of some body that would take them seriously and investigate them, I had to admit defeat. I did not do this with an easy heart as I was sure that the nature of the allegations of abuse and the revelations regarding Thomas Hamilton at Queen Victoria School warranted a proper investigation by a body that had no connection with the allegations.
Of course I do not know if sexual abuse against pupils at Queen Victoria School took place, but I did believe that The Housemaster was convinced of it, and I believed him to be a credible (he later became one of Scotland’s first Chartered Teachers) and honest person.
I did not expect much of a response when on 29th September 2004, I took one hard copy and two CDs of my formal complaint to the Family Protection Unit at Bannockburn Police Station. I was not disappointed as there were no police officers to accept my formal complaint, which was taken instead by a receptionist.
I did not receive any receipt or acknowledgement of my complaint.
The Housemaster was as disappointed as I was that I failed to have a proper investigation initiated, but he was not surprised at my failure whereas I was. I considered myself to be a positive person, someone who could get things done. Having been, for many years the founder and principal of a successful business, I was confident that I could get action where he had failed in the past. I was wrong.
A newspaper article was published shortly after my complaint but it was not connected to my efforts and there was no follow up to it. LINK
Then out of the blue Housemaster phoned me to say that Central Scotland Police had been in touch with him, and as a result of my complaint two officers would be travelling to Shetland to interview him.
This phone call from The Housemaster was made two years after I had made my formal complaint, and about thirteen years after he had complained at Stirling/Dunblane police stations!
Lessons learned by me that resonate with the Savile affair.
I suppose the main lessons I learned from promoting The Housemaster’s allegations about Queen Victoria School, Dunblane, was that when an ordinary citizen such as myself takes on a whistleblowing role that might involve the great and good in our society there is little chance of being taken seriously.
If those running Queen Victoria School had been ordinary Joe’s in charge of a state school then I have little doubt the forces of law and order would have listened to The Housemaster’s allegations in 1990 and my representation of them in 2004.
But to ask the establishment to investigate allegations that politicians and judges were taking boys away from an MOD school that was stewarded by senior politicians, senior judges, The General Officer Commanding (Scotland), and HRH The Duke of Edinburgh, et al. is a tall order.
The fact that Lord Cullen’s Dunblane Inquiry looked in forensic detail at Thomas Hamilton’s involvement with a host of state schools all over Central Scotland and his Report dealt extensively on this, yet he failed to mention one word about the fact that in evidence at the Inquiry it was not disputed that Thomas Hamilton had procured employment for a teacher at, camped in the grounds of, and used the firing range at, Queen Victoria School.
What does this say about deference to class?
Anyone challenging Sir James Winston Vincent Savile, OBE, KCSG, would have felt the full weight of the establishment come to bear on them. Just as I did when I asked Lord George Robertson of Port Ellen, the three simple questions I had asked the others, about what he knew of a group called the “Friends of QVS” and the presence of Thomas Hamilton at the school, and allegations of bullying and abuse.
Instead of a polite response from Lord George, he wrote to me on NATO headed paper stating that he knew of no inquiry into any allegations, considered my letter an impertinence, would not be answering any questions and would copy this response to the Chief Constable of Central Scotland Police. I firmly responded to this aggressive response.
I later learned that he had asked Andrew Cameron, Chief Constable of Central Scotland Police to investigate me! My solicitor was later advised by the police said these investigations were limited to basic background information checks against me to establish my motive in asking the questions of Lord Robertson who they said, they had a responsibility of protection for, given that he was a prominent public figure.
This much I was able to establish from police correspondence as a result of FOI requests, but I was unable to access the full extent of this request, as Lord George would not agree to allow the police to release his correspondence to me on the matter. Similarly he would not accede to my lawyer’s FOI requests via NATO HQ, from where he had sent his letters. LINK
But protection for Lord George from what? Polite, genuine questions of public interest. And what of the police’s duty to me, and those the allegations concerned?
When complaints involve the great and good the complainer may be the one who is investigated.
I am sure that Savile would have made this point to anyone who had the temerity to say they intended to complain about him.
Finally, there is a link in the case of Savile and the efforts of The Housemaster, who wrote a valedictory note to David Ross, at that time a reporter with the Scotsman, a copy of which was sent to me. It was a somewhat melodramatic though poignant synopsis of his efforts, it told of all the people he had contacted with his allegations, but who failed to help him (including Esther Rantzen who he told but she ignored him, just like she ignored the green room gossip) and ended in the words: “I can do no more now”. LINK
Footnote. Since Lord Burton has now passed on I can reveal that the Law Lord who bullied him to stop asking questions about Dunblane was Lord Fraser of Carmyllie. This was revealed to me in telephone conversations with Lord Burton, and reference was made to the incident in the Marcello Mega article in the News of the World, but he only identified him to me in confidence. The obligation of confidentiality is no longer relevant as he appeared to be afraid of Lord Fraser who is also departed.
Links inside >>> http://www.dunblaneexposed.info/2013/10 … -hamilton/
Was Thomas Hamilton supposed to be Mahakala?
Posted on 07 February 2010 by admin
The official police line in regard to the Death of Thomas Hamilton is unique in all of the murder investigations that I am aware of.
In fact every member of SAGBNI should have immediately picked up on this glaring oddity, but instead the SAGBNI forum has submerged to the depths of in-fighting and character assassination, than dwell on the realities that just may have saved their sport.
You see according to The Cullen Inquiry, which adopted the evidence of ‘Scene of Crime’ Investigator, the former Strathclyde police Sergeant, Malcolm Chisholm, Thomas Hamilton had to have been the living form of the Hindu God, Mahakala.
Thomas Hamilton couldn’t have been Vishnu, as Vishnu had only four arms, and Thomas Hamilton’s deeds, according to Malcolm Chisholm, were superior to even Vishnu. Just what exactly do you mean, you will ask? Well it’s really quite simple, and every shooter will confirm this observation.
Malcolm Chisholm stated, and it was accepted by the Cullen Inquiry that Thomas Hamilton was found wearing four holsters. Around his body were found four handguns, to wit, two Browning pistols and two Smith & Wesson revolvers, along with a certain amount of magazines for the two Browning pistols loaded, and unloaded and other spent cartridges.
Malcolm Chisholm stated emphatically that the evidence had not been touched.
That being the case, Thomas Hamilton could not have been Vishnu! Thomas Hamilton had to have been of a higher deity, and that means Mahakala.
You see a mere mortal armed with four handguns, and shooting targets, would have carried three of those handguns in their holsters, and used two hands to aim, shoot, and change over magazines, once the magazines became empty. Ordinary mere mortals would also have holstered the Browning pistol after shooting all the targets, and then producing the Smith & Wesson revolver in which to end the facade by killing himself.
Thus, armed with four handguns, and needing an extra hand to steady the handgun, cock, unload and reload, Thomas Hamilton would have required at least five hands. There are no five armed deities, even in Hindu, which simply means that Thomas Hamilton would have required six hands and arms.
Had Thomas Hamilton been a mere mortal shooter, then three of his firearms would have been in their holsters. Even to exchange firearms, the first would have been replaced back in its holster and then the next firearm would have been produced.
But apparently Thomas Hamilton according to Lord Cullen was not a mere mortal. Thomas Hamilton then could only have been Mahakala of the 6 arms, a Hindu God, a God of Death and Destruction; Mahakala.
Andrew S MacGregor
A FOOTNOTE FROM ANDREW MACGREGOR
By using such focuses as Mahakala, it should make it obvious to any shooter that what happened, or rather what we were told happened, is absolute rubbish. Most honest shooters would have been aware that they had been ‘done in’, but wouldn’t know how or by whom. Now after reading the above, they would definitely know. I hope!
You see, what they did at Dunblane was to put the focus on the handguns, for virtually a visual effect. Even though all the children and teachers were shot with the one handgun, they wanted as many guns as possible to enhance their picture. They also wanted to overpower any suggestion that Dunblane was a one in a million occurrence.
What you also had at Dunblane was Malcolm Chisholm (Scene of Crime Officer), who was outside the constabulary, controlling everything. That is why Grant McCutcheon (the off-duty police officer) had to be forgotten very quickly.
You know, if SAGBNI had been doing its job properly from the start, then most of these anomalies would have been exposed.
Since they weren’t, then either SAGBNI was run by very incompetent men, and they’re not, or they had to be fifth columns.
I blame police sex ring for conspiracy of silence over the Dunblane massacre
Posted on 05 June 2005 by admin
Byline: FIDELMA COOK
Source: MAIL ON SUNDAY
POLICE were involved in a paedophile ring that covered up abuse allegations against the man responsible for the Dunblane school massacre, it was claimed last night.
The astonishing claim is being made by former paramedic Sandra Uttley, who is going to the European Court of Human Rights to demand a new inquiry into the tragedy.
Sixteen children and their teacher were shot dead by Thomas Hamilton in March 1996 after he burst into their school gym and fired at random as the youngsters began an exercise class. The attack prompted tighter gun controls in the UK.
Miss Uttley alleges that Lord Cullen’s inquiry into the massacre was fatally flawed because crucial evidence was withheld from it.
The 45-year-old, who dealt with the aftermath of the killings in her job as a paramedic, said: ‘There are glaring anomalies in the inquiry – inconsistencies in witness testimony, incorrect information given on oath and the absence of vital witnesses.
‘It is also blatantly obvious that Central Scotland Police, who were chosen to investigate the background to the murders, should never have been involved in a so-called independent inquiry.
‘They were implicated in the events under scrutiny and continually provided Hamilton with renewals of his gun licence despite long-term and repeated warnings that this should not happen. It was known that Hamilton had friends in the police force, including one highly placed officer.
‘Lord Cullen read none of the preparatory material before the inquiry. That material has now been sealed and locked away for 100 years despite the public never having had the chance to see those documents.
‘I believe that Hamilton was a major provider of pornographic photographs and videos to a ring of men prominent in Central Scotland, including police officers who protected him from numerous allegations of physical abuse at boys’ camps and clubs he ran.
They protected themselves after the massacre which conveniently ended in his suicide. Going to Europe is my only hope that the truth will finally be heard. I believe there are more people who should be brought to justice.’
Miss Uttley is asking the court to rule that, as a former Dunblane resident, her rights have been breached because the inquiry was not independent, transparent or effective.
The existence of the secret dossier of evidence which was withheld from the Cullen inquiry was first reported by The Mail on Sunday two years ago. Held at the National Archives in Edinburgh, the 106 documents reveal why prosecutors failed to bring the gunman to court before the massacre despite more than 20 complaints, mostly about his running of sports clubs and a summer camp at Loch Lomond in 1991.
The existence of the report was mentioned at the inquiry but never seen. In fact, Lord Cullen ruled in favour of a motion that the prosecutors who decided not to take legal proceedings against Hamilton should not have to justify their decision.
Among the sealed documents is a report revealing that a senior prosecutor ordered pictures of semi-naked children, seized as evidence before the tragedy, to be returned to Hamilton. Others link the gunman to the Freemasons.
Last year Miss Uttley’s former partner, Mick North, whose fiveyearold daughter Sophie was killed by Hamilton, said he was ‘convinced’ of a cover-up.
Miss Uttley added: ‘It is my firm belief that the truth has not come out and there has been a total cover-up to protect a number of people. Europe is my last hope.’
A spokesman for Central Scotland Police said: ‘It would be inappropriate for us to make any comment at this time.’ Detective Chief Superintendent John Ogg, who headed the Dunblane investigation, has said of criticism in the past: ‘I can reassure you that the investigation was absolutely thorough and we covered every angle.’
Miss Uttley has written repeatedly to Lord Cullen demanding explanation to her claims. Most of her letters were answered by inquiry clerk Glynis McKeand, who said witnesses were selected by the Crown, not by the judge.
Queen Victoria School’s governing body
Posted on 08 April 2010 by admin
Queen Victoria School’s governing body is the BOARD OF HER MAJESTY’S COMMISSIONERS who are responsible to the Secretary of State for Defence. Spec” members, Lord Cullen, Lord Ross, PRINCE PHILIP and D MacLehose have all been on the Board and had a leading legal responsibility for the custody and care of the pupils at QVS, not least those who were physically and sexually abused.
The Lord Justice Clerk, Lord Ross, announced his decision to retire that position in January 1997. He was succeeded by Lord Cullen, who became well-known through his chairmanship of the inquiries into the Piper Alpha disaster and the shootings at Dunblane Primary School. Lord Cullen was sworn in on 15 January 1997, a few months after the conclusion of the Dunblane Inquiry.
Non-Spec members – but could well be Masons nevertheless – Malcolm Rifkind, Ian Lang and Michael Forsyth, as Conservative Secretaries of State for Scotland respectively from 11 January 1986 to 28 November 1990, from 28 November 1990 to 5 July 1995, and from 5 July 1995 to 2 May 1997, were all Presidents of the Board of Her Majesty’s Commissioners.
As Secretary of State for Defence from 10 April 1992 to 5 July 1995, MALCOLM RIFKIND had PRINCIPAL responsibility for the children at QVS during that period.
Blame the rock she has her faults
The Murder of Thomas Hamilton
Posted on 07 February 2010 by admin
I remember years ago of reading the Novel, ‘The Godfather’ of the planning to murder a bent police captain who was working with the opposition. It was the statement that ‘people will not look at the gunman’.
In the Port Arthur Massacre which occurred 6 weeks after the Dunblane Massacre, most of the people inside the Broad Arrow Café did not look at the gunman once the shooting started. Those that did died. You see, once the shooting started and people realised what was happening they sort the only cover available. People inside the café part of the building left their chairs and laid prone on the floor. Any movement was noticed by the gunman who then simply walked up to that person and shot them through the head. There were thirteen people who were executed in that manner within the Broad Arrow Café, which can be garnished from the report written in the American Wound Ballistics Review by Sergeant Gerard Dutton.
I believe a similar situation would have occurred at Dunblane. None of the survivors would have been able to obtain a good viewing of the gunman. Most of those that did see the gunman would have immediately associated him with the figure of Thomas Hamilton that lay dead within the gymnasium after the massacre. That is the way the mind works.
One of the first items that comes to mind within the context of the shooting at Dunblane is that there were two different types of shooting that took place within the school gymnasium.
Type (1) the gunman enters the gymnasium and starts shooting at the children and teachers. Those children who were shot and fell to the floor were then executed by the gunman walking up to them, placing a foot on their body to hold them still and then shooting them in the head.
It was noted that the gunman murdered far more girls (11) than he did boys (5) and this to me suggests that the gunman deliberately targeted the young female pupils. If there was a similar ratio with the wounded pupils, then I believe that would enhance my belief in this matter.
It is stated within the Tayside Police report on the Dunblane Primary School report No. FSL 1010/96 that the gunman was equipped with 25 extended box type magazines capable of holding 20 rounds each. That is 500 rounds of ammunition for the Browning pistol that was used to murder the pupils and teacher, and wound many others inside the gymnasium.
Of these magazines, 4 were found to be empty, and another three were partially empty. The actual pistol used in these murders when found by the police was devoid of any magazine, but still had a round in the firing chamber. In other words, the gunman had removed the magazine prior to using all the ammunition within the magazine. There was no indication that I could find to tell me whether the safety switch of this pistol had been placed on.
At this stage, we have a gunman whose apparent intent is to murder as many school children as he can. At the end of his shooting within the gymnasium he is still in possession of 13 fully loaded magazines, and three partially loaded magazines. There is nothing to stop the gunman from now going from classroom to classroom killing more children, if that was his intent.
However towards the end of the shooting incident, the gunman changes his shooting style.
Type (2) the gunman now instead of targeting the pupils within the gymnasium, now replaces his magazine with a full magazine, moves to the fire exit door and fires upon the adjacent buildings. One witness, a Mrs Currie, I believe was also fired upon at this stage, but was not wounded. The gunman then retreated but into the gymnasium.
My belief is that the gunman carried out this procedure a second time, that is reloaded his pistol with a full magazine, moved to the fire exit door, and fired at the adjourning buildings.
With this type of shooting it is obvious that the gunman was not endeavouring to murder any pupil or teacher, so what was his endeavour in carrying this type of shooting?
Any student in the adjourning building who may have heard the noise from the discharge of the pistol would have become curious as to what was happening and would have been looking in the direction of the gymnasium. When the gunman stepped out from the ‘fire exit’ door and fired in the directions of the adjourning buildings, any such student or teacher looking would have immediately ducked for cover. They would no longer be watching that area.
A second similar action would have discouraged any pupil whose curiosity got the better of them. All students and teachers are now huddled on the floor of their classrooms, and are totally oblivious to what is about to happen.
The gunman returns to the gymnasium ejects the third magazine from his pistol and then exits the gymnasium via the fire exit door, as his escape route has been made ‘safe’ for him to leave unseen.
That can be the only reason why there was a change in the type of shooting that occurred at Dunblane.
If the gunman was intent on murdering as many pupils as possible, then there is no reason why he couldn’t have traversed from classroom to classroom, and murdered many more children. Why did the gunman choose to commit his murders in a gymnasium where there was plenty of space for the children to run, and places to hide? It would have been far easier to enter a classroom and murder entire classes with much more ease than shooting the pupils in the gymnasium.
If the gunman was bent on suicide after his massacre, then why choose the more difficult area of the gymnasium over a far easier grouping of children in their classrooms? If the gunman was also knowingly going to commit suicide at the end of his killing spree, the classrooms would have been the perfect choice, but the gunman chose the gymnasium where there was an escape route.
The gunman then prepared his escape route by firing at the adjourning buildings and then left unseen and unnoticed.
We now come to the second part of the massacre. The children and their teacher hiding in the storeroom heard somebody enter the gymnasium. There was mention that they believed the gunman may have been convinced to give himself up. There was also a mention of witnesses hearing the gunman scream just before he shot himself.
This would be a first in recorded suicides where the gunman screamed just prior to putting his .357 Smith & Wesson revolver into his mouth and pulling the trigger. However, if somebody shoved a Smith & Wesson revolver into your mouth, would you not scream?
According to information that came to light after the Cullen Inquiry, Thomas Hamilton died from two bullet wounds fired into the roof of his mouth, one bullet exiting above the left ear, and another through the top of his head.
There were two bullet holes in the wall behind Thomas Hamilton’s body in line with where such two bullets would have travelled if Thomas Hamilton had been shot whilst being held down.
Once it was established that Thomas Hamilton had been shot twice, then that rules out all possibility of suicide, and means that Thomas Hamilton was murdered. However the deduction that Hamilton was murdered does not rest solely on this piece of evidence. It is supported by evidence from the witnesses.
Consider what the teacher and the children tell us, when they state that they heard somebody enter the gymnasium and that they believed that the gunman may have been convinced to give himself up.
Alright, how do you expect the gunman who has just murdered 17 persons and wounded several others to react if somebody unexpectedly entered the gymnasium? You would expect the gunman to start shooting at these people as well. There is no record of any person admitting to such an event.
In other words, the gunman must have been expecting somebody to enter the gymnasium, while the murders were still taking place, or at the end of those murders. And all this time, the gunman is still in possession of his Browning pistol. There is no evidence at this stage of the .357 Smith & Wesson revolver. All the shooting up to this date is by the Browning pistol.
There is at this stage a conversation that takes place. How do we know a conversation took place? The teacher and the children thought that the gunman may have been convinced to give himself up. Such a belief can only come about because these witnesses heard people talking.
It is my belief that at this stage the gunman exited the gymnasium. How do I make this assumption? Because the Browning pistol was made safe, by ejecting the box magazine and I would believe engaging the safety switch, because there was still the unfired cartridge in the firing chamber.
Now just how could the gunman do this if he had exchanged the Browning pistol for the Smith & Wesson revolver? He couldn’t complete this action with safety, unless another person was holding the Smith & Wesson revolver.
So, how many people do we have involved in the conversation heard by the teacher and the children? We have the gunman, who departs as soon as possible, and I believe before the death of Thomas Hamilton. We have Thomas Hamilton. We have the person holding the Smith & Wesson revolver and I believe there would be one other person as well.
If Thomas Hamilton was escorted into the gymnasium by a person holding the .357 Smith & Wesson revolver, there was still the possibility that even a coward like Hamilton would make an unexpected move. There would have to have been another person besides the person armed with the Smith & Wesson revolver to ensure that things went according to plan.
Also there would have to be a person to throw Thomas Hamilton to the floor of the gymnasium and to hold him there whilst the person armed with the Smith & Wesson placed the revolver in Hamilton’s mouth and then pulled the trigger.
It was at this stage that Hamilton emitted the scream that was heard by some of the witnesses. And Hamilton did struggle, even though he was being held. He moved the only part of his body that was not constrained. He moved his head, and moved it to the right just as the gunman with the Smith & Wesson pulled the trigger. It was this shot that exited above the left ear. It was the second shot that exited at the top of the head and took with it Hamilton’s brain, which the policeman McCutcheon saw separate from the body.
Constable Grant McCutcheon, the off-duty policeman who was the first policeman to enter the school gymnasium gave us some vital clues to the Dunblane massacre. McCutcheon stated: “I also saw, at the same time as all this, that the gunman was gurgling and breathing heavily.”
What this means is that Constable Grant McCutcheon had entered the gymnasium before Hamilton’s body had completed its death sequences, or in other words within under a minute of Thomas Hamilton being murdered.
McCutcheon also saw the school janitor John Currie at the body of Thomas Hamilton, and saw Currie moved one of the two pistols that were near the body. Then there was the student teacher, David Scott who in his witness statement said that he saw Thomas Hamilton put a handgun up near his mouth.
I believe we now have sufficient evidence to question just exactly what involvement in the murder of Thomas Hamilton that the witnesses John Currie and David Scott played. I further believe that these two witnesses would also be able to name the gunman who murdered the 16 children and one teacher and wound three teachers and another twelve children.
Andrew S. MacGregor
Sandra Uttley Statement
Posted on 16 October 2006 by admin
When the Dunblane massacre happened in March 1996, I was in the most stable settled part of my life. I’d lived on the outskirts of Dunblane since the early 1980s, but in April 1995 I bought a small flat in the town itself, not far from the imposing 13th century Cathedral.
In August 1995 I joined the Scottish Ambulance Service and began work at the station just 9 miles north of Dunblane. I am ashamed to say that during my training I didn’t pay much attention to dealing with gunshot injuries as to my mind that was a ‘city’ problem and not something I was likely to encounter in the little backwater where I lived and worked.
Fortunately I wasn’t due back on duty on 13 March till 8pm. My colleagues Alison and Les received THAT dreadful call and were the first ambulance personnel to arrive at the school, declaring it a Major Incident.
I was called in a few hours later to relieve them from duty. Having collected the ambulance from Stirling, myself and another colleague Russell went back to station to clean out the ambulance that had transported 5 year old Mhairi MacBeath to hospital. She was declared dead on arrival, from a single gunshot wound to the head. Mhairi’s father had been my philosophy lecturer at university in the early ‘80s. He had tragically died six months before Mhairi’s murder, from a brain haemorrhage. He hadn’t lived to see his second daughter, Katherine, born. And on the day of Mhairi’s murder, a memorial service was being held in his memory. His wife Isabel had thought about keeping Mhairi off school that day, but decided it was for her own selfish reasons and besides, Mhairi didn’t want to miss gym. Within an hour, her daughter was dead.
I bring in such personal detail, because to my mind it is too easy for people to forget the enormous loss of life on 13 March 1996 and the individual tragic stories involved in each death.
Back at my ambulance station, I waited with dread for Alison and Les to return after their debriefing. I didn’t know what I could possibly say to them. They were deeply shocked and traumatised. Alison simply said, “that is not a job you would have wanted so early in your career”. I was so incredibly relieved it hadn’t been me. Les could barely speak. He kept on making a gun trigger gesture to his head and said that is how the children had died. They had been disabled and then shot through the head as they lay injured on the gym floor. For some reason very little has been said about this aspect of the massacre – that 11 girls were shot through the head. I am not certain how many of the 5 boys who were killed died from head injuries. The gunman didn’t seem to have the boys as his target as clearly as he did the girls. One boy who was lying injured was shot in the back, not the head, giving him more chance of survival (and indeed this boy, Matthew Birnie, did survive).
A head shot virtually guarantees death and the gunman was clearly intent on making this a true massacre, in every sense of the word.
Just how had this obscenity happened?
It has taken all of ten years for me to finally understand why Dunblane happened. I remember being very surprised when the bereaved parents called for a ban on handguns, as to my mind this was an obvious failure of policing. Thomas Hamilton should NEVER have been allowed to own guns. Britain had no noticeable ‘gun culture’ as in the States. I would imagine that the majority of people, like me, had no idea that target shooting as a sport existed. The very rare gun crime we heard about was part of the criminal underworld. We did not have a problem with legally held weapons in this country.
But, waiting in the wings was Gill Marshall-Andrews, wife of British MP Bob Marshall-Andrews, with her embryonic Gun Control Network (GCN). In Australia and New Zealand, Rebecca Peters and Philip Alpers too were waiting to pounce. After the massacre at Port Arthur, Peters and Alpers were in action.
In preparation for the Cullen Inquiry into the Dunblane massacre, the solicitor representing the bereaved and injured children’s families, invited each family to express their concerns about – amongst other matters – gun control. Those who expressed the strongest views, in particular, Mick North, who lost his only child in the massacre, were then co-opted into the gun control movement. Mick has remained there ever since.
I began a relationship with Mick a few months after Sophie’s death (his wife had died a few years earlier) and after our relationship ended, I worked for him for the next 7 years as his Personal Assistant. By then Mick was travelling the world on his gun control ‘mission’ and I held the fort back in Scotland whilst he was away on his endless trips.
It was only in 1999 that I discovered that all the Dunblane Inquiry documents had been locked away for an astonishing 100 years (a closure order that has since been declared illegal). Whilst for the previous 3 years I’d thought in terms of police incompetence re Thomas Hamilton, NOW I realised that something much more sinister was going on. Still, I had nothing to work on – or so I thought.
At the end of 2002, I accidently stumbled across some information on the internet about Dunblane that was to set me off on this path – searching for the truth. Once you find yourself on this road, it is impossible to get off. That said, I never expected to be battling on nearly 4 years later. I naively thought that once the parents and the media discovered about all the lies told at the Dunblane Inquiry, there would be an uproar. There has been nothing of the sort.
For the first 6 years after the massacre, I hadn’t doubted for one minute that Thomas Hamilton had killed himself immediately after his shooting spree. But once I began studying all the evidence from the transcript of the Inquiry, there were such glaring inconsistencies and blatant lies about the scene of crime in the gym, that it soon became clear to me that Hamilton had been shot and killed and hadn’t committed suicide at all.
Now if that was the case, why? Surely after what Hamilton had just done, this person would have been hailed a hero? But there was a difficulty though. The massacre was said to have taken just 3 minutes. If Hamilton was killed, how did his assassin get there so quick? I don’t need to go into any more detail now about that, as this is all in my book.
But when you look at all the evidence coming to light now about the Port Arthur massacre in Australia and the Columbine massacre in the States, Dunblane would seem to not be alone in terms of inconsistent evidence, disappearing vital witnesses, a refusal of the mainstream media to print anything about that, the ridiculing and hounding of those campaigners like myself who fight to be heard, AND the total silence of both GCN and the International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA) of which Mick is closely involved.
On 2 October 2005, Mick saturated the British press with his claims that there had been no cover-up of the truth about the massacre in which his beloved only child had been killed. All the articles were full of inaccuracies and, in all honesty, downright untruths. No newspaper would print a right of reply from me, the main campaigner for the truth about the Dunblane massacre. I had – at last – been silenced.
Why would a parent do this? Mick has, without a doubt, been brainwashed by the international gun control movement. There can be no other explanation for why a father would so blatantly stamp the truth about his daughter’s murder into the ground ……… and to my mind, this left the door wide open for further gun massacres. It is a tragic irony that exactly one year later, on 2 October 2006, in a small backwater in Pennsylvania, a place where, like Dunblane, these things just do not happen, five schoolgirls were executed, Dunblane-style.
These gun massacres are always said to be the work of the lone nut gunman. I don’t know enough about the details of all the other school massacres we have witnessed around the western world these last two decades. Andrew MacGregor has done much work in that area and will be speaking about this in a couple of days.
But I do know enough about Dunblane now to know that Thomas Hamilton more than likely did not commit the Dunblane massacre. Hamilton was – no other word for it – the patsy. He was set up that day and he paid with his life. And because the truth about the Dunblane atrocity has been buried, you can be sure that we will see more and more of this kind of modern warfare, where children are sacrificed for some supposed greater good that ‘the planners’ would wish for.
Dunblane: The unanswered questions
Posted on 22 June 2003 by admin
Byline: David Leslie
Source: News of the World
Page: Scotland 4
Picture Caption: HAGGER: Testified for probe;TAYLOR: Warning;NORTH: Heartache
;UTTLEY: Took over ambulance;CULLEN: Inquiry;FACE OF THE
BEAST: Monster Thomas Hamilton with kids at one of his
camps, above, and, right, leering at camera;SCENE OF THE
CRIME:Primary school where horror unfolded
Shocking claims as duo demand a second probe
A NEW inquiry should be held into the Dunblane massacre because dozens of questions about the tragedy remain unanswered, according to two concerned campaigners.
The pair have spent months drawing up a detailed dossier about the horrific shootings.
And they claim that there are discrepancies between the official inquiry, presided over by Lord Cullen, and statements from witnesses at the time.
One woman, Sandra Uttley, was a local ambulance worker.
The other, Doreen Hagger, gave evidence at the Cullen inquiry.
They believe there may have been a cover-up. Questions they now want answered include:
WHO did killer Thomas Hamilton meet and talk to on the way to Dunblane primary school?
WHO was the off-duty police officer at the scene and why has his identity been concealed?
WHY have Hamilton’s post mortem results been kept secret?
WHY ambulance service records are not being made public, and WHY was there confusion over the number of guns Hamilton had at the school?
The women – who have drawn up a 50-point, 5,000 word dossier on the affair – are furious that many of the official reports are being kept under wraps.
Government ministers have ruled that much of the evidence about the tragedy should not be made public for 100 years.
Last night Uttley said: “A new inquiry is now urgently needed.
“There may be other individuals who should face prosecution.”
The horror unfolded on March 13, 1996, when 43-year-old misfit Hamilton gunned down 16 pupils and teacher Gwen Mayor at the Stirlingshire school.
The atrocity shocked the nation and an official probe was launched under Lord Cullen.
But Uttley and Hagger believe too many mysteries remain.
They point to the statement of one local, Cathleen Boswell Kerr, who said she’d seen the killer standing beside – or climbing from – a large grey saloon car before he travelled to the school.
It was parked outside his Stirling home sometime between 8am and 8.40 on the fateful day.
According to Kerr, Hamilton looked cheerful. He waved as the grey car left, then walked to his white hire van.
But Kerr DIDN’T give evidence at the Cullen inquiry.
And the two women want to know what steps were taken to trace Hamilton’s mystery visitor.
Mum-of-six Hagger helped out at a children’s camp organised by the oddball loner who went on to become Scotland’s worst mass murderer.
Her daughter Vikki, then seven years old, was one of the youngsters who attended.
Both were concerned about his behaviour and complained to cops about him. Though he had already come to the attention of Central Scotland Police after official complaints about his camps and the clubs he ran for boys, Hagger believes her warnings about him went unheeded.
She told us: “I was overwhelmed with a feeling of guilt that I had not done more to stop Hamilton.
“We still have a lot of work to do and much evidence to cover.
“But I feel everyone has been robbed of justice.”
Vikki later wrote to Lord Cullen to tell of her nightmare over not being taken seriously.
Her mum also appeared before the judge at his inquiry in Stirling.
Cullen’s intensive probe lasted from May 29 until July 10, 1996.
But, according to Uttley and Hagger, his investigation FAILED to reveal the identity of the off-duty police officer they believe to
have been first on the scene.
The man followed the primary school’s headteacher Ron Taylor into the gym where the carnage had taken place.
He then warned the head- master, and the school janitor John Currie, not to touch a gun which lay next to Hamilton’s body on the gym floor.
But despite his key role, the officer’s name has never been released to the public. And the two campaigners want to know WHY his identity has been concealed.
They also want to know why the public hasn’t been given access to the results of a post mortem carried out on Hamilton.
Uttley explained: “We know that a full dissection was carried out.
“Pathologist Anthony Busuttil said the cause of death was gunshot
“But this does not explain the manner of Hamilton’s death.
“Some sources suggest his body was discovered lying close to a wall in which there were TWO bullet holes, six inches from the floor and a couple of inches apart.
“But what did the wounds on Hamilton’s body show?
“The post mortem results would surely clear up this point and explain whether or not he suffered other gunshot injuries that were not fatal.”
Uttley could have been one of the ambulance staff who raced to the scene, just minutes after Hamilton’s killing spree ended.
She was on a day off from her job at the ambulance station in nearby Callander and only learned of the horror from a friend.
She was called in to work later that day.
The crew she relieved had raced several of Hamilton’s young victims to hospital, and were traumatised as a result.
But Uttley and Hagger claim the role of the ambulance service has been obscured.
They claimed: “Lord Cullen said in his report the ambulance service arrived at the school at 9.57 and the police at 9.50 am.
“Our own sources suggest ambulancewoman Alison Irvine made a statement indicating that when she and colleague Leslie Haire arrived at the school at 9.57am there were NO police cars or police officers there – just the mystery man who claimed to be an off-duty policeman.
“Ron Taylor met them and said they were the first to arrive.
“The ambulance staff then radioed their control room to say they were dealing with a major incident.
“Police witnesses said at the inquiry they arrived at the primary school at 9.50am.
“But the Accident and Emergency Department at Stirling Royal Infirmary received notification of a shooting incident at Dunblane at 9.48am. Who from? We want to know why details about the ambulance service’s role should be hidden for 100 years.”
The two women are also puzzled by the confusion over the number of weapons found at the scene.
Uttley – the former partner of Dr Mick North, whose daughter Sophie died that day – added: “Some witnesses suggest Hamilton had two guns at the primary school, others say he had four.
“Malcolm Chisholm and David Gould, the ammunition and bomb disposal experts, also differ over their examination of the guns.
“Why were these vital issues not properly clarified at the inquiry?”
Some of the discrepancies, they claim, might have been cleared up by the Scene Of Crime report.
But they added: “It’s been hidden away until 2096. Why?”
Uttley and Hagger also want to know why photographs of the crime scene weren’t taken until late afternoon – though Hamilton ran amok shortly after the school first opened.
Hagger added: “There were concerns that Hamilton’s body might be booby trapped.
“Why then was the bomb disposal centre not alerted until 2.30pm? And why on earth were there people present in the gym when the bomb disposal expert arrived?
“The gym was supposed to have been evacuated at noon because of concerns about a booby trap.”
Among the other queries raised by the couple’s dossier is the question of where Hamilton went between leaving his home and arriving at Dunblane primary school.
Uttley revealed: “A policeman said CCTV cameras picked up Hamilton’s van leaving Stirling on the morning of March 13, 1996 at 8.44 and 8.46.
“The journey to Dunblane school would normally take just 15 minutes.
“Yet Hamilton did not arrive there until 9.30. Where did he go in the half hour that’s unaccounted for?”
The pair are also intrigued by the matter of Hamilton’s finances.
Hagger told us: “Some sources suggest he obtained two credit cards and spent freely at the end of 1995 and the beginning of 1996.
“But he was unemployed – and this has never been fully explained.”
The duo say they are determined to battle on until they win a fresh inquiry into the horror.
Uttley – who has written a series of articles about male violence and guns – began work on her dossier in December last year.
In February, she wrote to Hagger asking for her help. They claim they have examined and cross-referenced every word of the Cullen report since then.
Uttley told us: “I will never give up on this until we get to the truth.”
And Hagger added: “This has caused us a lot of stress.
“Some of what we’ve uncovered makes me despair.
“Yet I think it is only right that people should know about this and decide for themselves whether or not a new inquiry is merited.”
But last night the officer who headed the Dunblane investigation was adamant that Central Scotland Police left no stone unturned.
Detective Chief Superintendent John Ogg, who has now retired from the force, told us: “I can reassure you that the investigation into the Dunblane incident was absolutely thorough, and we covered every angle.
“I don’t subscribe to any of these allegations at all.”
And he added: “I have no idea why someone would wish to come up with theories like these.”
Speaking from his home in Perthshire, Mick North told us: “I have been asked by Sandra about what happened on the day, and have answered her questions. There are areas that I feel could do with better explanation, but I am not prepared to go into specifics.
“I think it’s most unlikely that the conspiracy goes as far as is being alleged.”
During the investigation, it was claimed that student teacher David Scott witnessed Hamilton kill himself. However, Scott did not himself give evidence, and when asked if he did see the killer commit suicide, he refused to make any comment at all.
He told the News of the World: “I have not spoken about this before, and have no intention of doing so.”
Headmaster Ron Taylor blasted the pair’s findings and said he could not understand why they would wish to open up old wounds.
He added: “It is rubbish. There is no substance to it at all.
“Hundreds of statements were given, and only a select few were actually used for Cullen, to spare those affected by the incident the trauma of going through it again.
“Every single person who was in the school on the day gave a statement to the police.
“Only a few people gave verbal evidence to the Cullen Inquiry.
“The vast majority of the report was about the police. There is no cover-up.”
Thomas Hamilton (1)
October 2013 (1)
June 2012 (2)
April 2010 (1)
February 2010 (2)
October 2006 (1)
June 2005 (1)
February 2005 (1)
June 2003 (1)
March 2003 (1)
Upload to Disclose.tv
Blame the rock she has her faults
Upload to Disclose.tv
Gille Brigte, Earl of Strathearn
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The 2nd seal of Gille Brigte (Gilbert), Earl or Mormaer of Strathearn.
Gille Brigte of Strathearn (Francized as Gilbert) is the third known Mormaer of Strathearn. He is one of the most famous of the Strathearn mormaers. He succeeded his father Ferchar in 1171. He is often known by the Francization of his name, Gilbert, or by various anglicizations, such as Gilbride, Gilbridge, etc. A more modern version of his name is Giolla or Gille Brighde, and means – roughly – devotee of St Brigit.
Unikely his predecessors, we know for certain that Mormaer Gille Brigte was a regular attendee of the entourage of the Scottish king (in this case, King William I). Gille Brigte even served as the Justiciar of Scotia, an office usually held by the Mormaers of Fife, during the minority of Donnchad. Gille Brigte accompanied the King on his expeditions against Harald Maddadsson, the “rebellious” Earl of Orkney and Mormaer of Caithness. When William was captured at Alnwick in 1174, Gille Brigte too became a hostage, and shared William’s fate as a prisoner at Falaise.
In 1213, Gille Brigte acted as an arbitrator in the controversy over the succession to the Mormaerdom of Menteith, the neighboruing Mormaerdom. Gille Brigte was one of the Mormaers present at the coronation of King Alexander II in 1215, at Scone.
Gille Brigte’s reign brought Strathearn more fully into the fold of Scottish politics, although it does seem that he spent many of his last years in seclusion in Strathearn. He died in 1223.
Remember from a thread Ima posted apon William the Lion of Scotland this is the masonic connection the dots are not so easy for folks to pick up on but what that Ima been finding deep rooted to the not so long ago to the most blacked out era in history of Scotland is a demonic ritual conspiracy. . .
GOD BLESS ALL VICTIMS AND SURVIVORS. . .
Blame the rock she has her faults