BUT I THOUGHT ANNE MADE THE NAMES UP OUT OF SPITE?

HOW COULD HOLLIE NAME “EVELYN” EITHER AS THE SISTER OR SISTER-IN-LAW IF THERE IS NO SUCH PERSON?!

HOW COULD HOLLIE NAME CHILDREN SHE HAD NEVER MET UNTIL SHE WAS 17 YEARS OLD?!

Now – based on the evidence…..who should be interviewed again?

HHMMMM LETS SAY GREG AND DENIS

THE FACTS

The document produced by the Police Complaints Commission for Scotland included the lines. “The position, as far as I can determine it, is that there seems a sufficiency of evidence to accept, on the balance of probability, that X was sexually abused, and that this has included penetration of her private parts. Given that X, because of her disabilities, has been closely supervised throughout her life, the perpetrator is most likely to have been someone close to her who had regular, unsupervised access.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *