BROTHER JIM GAMBLE SELF PUBLISIST AND HYPOCRITE OR SOMETHING MUCH MUCH WORSE

Tuesday, 6 April 2010

JIM GAMBLE:::::OPERATION ORE

By Metodo 2 (Textusa & Ironside) Jim Gamble Chief Executive CEOP Formerly Assistant Chief Constable of the National Crime Squad (Responsible for co-ordinating Operation Ore) 

As a direct consequence of the STATEMENTS and DECISIONS of Jim Gamble and associated people, the presumption of innocence was completely disregarded, GUILT, was exaggerated to comply with the demand “ratings” as lynching usually invokes and provokes.

The result was that LIVES were endangered and some LOST.

Public morals were corrupted and JUSTICE was denied.

Let’s remember that it was CEOP Jim Gamble who profiled Robert Murat and said he is THE MOST LIKELY TO HAVE TAKEN MADELEINE… Guess from who Gerry McCann got the CEOP manuals not for public use?

OBU Investigators UK took on the challenge and see that Justice is served. It has been a long hard battle. But one worth fighting. Those that fight for TRUTH and JUSTICE shall prevail.

Those that use the names of TRUTH and JUSTICE only deserve the most shameful of defeats.

Finally, the JUSTICE they seek may be about to become a reality. They have a lawyer CHRIS SALTRESE, (do remember this name) you are about to hear a lot more from him.

CHRIS has worked Pro Bono to make this day happen. Permission has been granted to allow the Operation Ore group action test, or specimen, appeal to be heard before the High Court in London.

Hearing in the High Court is to commence on 27th April and 28th April 2010.  

UPDATE: This blog has been requested to add the following text: Operation Ore.

We want to hear from you now. We want to hear from you now if you were convicted or cautioned for incitement and if you were convicted or cautioned for possession. The test appeal is listed for hearing in the High Court in London on 27 and 28 April 2010. If the outcome is successful, we will be arranging a raft of appeals and related actions. Contact ed-inquisition@live.ie

Update on Oct 5th, 2010: Gamble is Gone

92 comments:

  1. If we are successful in the High Court, the international phase of the group action will roll-out in the form of other group or class actions in many, if not all, of the 60 countries that were, through an FBI-influenced Interpol, subjected to police raids based on the US Landslide evidence. The hope for the international phase is that each country where a fight-back is required will appoint a co-ordinator who will liaise with the group action team and copy its procedure in its own local campaign.

    ReplyDelete

  2. We are currently investigating one of the biggest Police operations in history, Operation Ore. We at OBU have uncovered so much damning evidence, we have declared this as the largest miscarriage of justice in the UK this century. In view of the money involved and the death and destruction it wreaked, it is arguably the crime of the century. That is not something that will stand the test of time and various bodies and people have worked on the issues independently and collectively.

    ReplyDelete

  3. Jim Gamble speaking to Parliament

    Jim Gamble, currently head of CEOP the child protection agency and formerly the principle police officer heading up Operation Ore, said this as part of a statement he made to Parliament on18 December 2002.

    “If you consider Operation Ore, in 1999 towards 7,000 people in the UK sat at their computers and accessed child abuse web sites. Three or four years later, that investigation is on-going.”

    And in a threatening aside to the listening public: “Trust me, I am a police officer. We will be able to apply our investigation techniques against you.”

    (Jim Gamble was formerly a senior police officer in Northern Ireland.)

    ReplyDelete

  4. Margaret Moran (MP) in Parliament 26 October 2005

    “‘Operation Ore, the massive police investigation into child internet pornography, identified over 7,000 people in the UK, including judges, doctors and teachers, who used their credit cards to download images of children being abused or even killed for their gratification. Police believe that that is the tip of the iceberg. Those who download such images say that they have committed no crime, but every single vile picture that includes babies and children being raped and tortured has destroyed an innocent life. Through the internet, criminal gangs are making money out of this misery. That has gone unchallenged for too long and the time has come to right this wrong.”

    ReplyDelete

  5. There was a 3 Part documentary by BBC aired 23rd March 2004..Hard to understand why BBC so compliant to show footage of police being briefed prior to raids without any evidence. Of Course this has now been pulled..

    However here is one member of the audience and what he had to say.

    One reader responds after viewing the videos

    I remember watching this BBC ‘documentary’- a curious term for bovinely uncritical police propaganda – when it was first shown. I keep picturing that young police officer, brimful of virtuous violence and malignant malice, gloating to all the assembled about the people they were about to destroy, and maybe even cause to kill themselves. And his assertions, his rationale, the ‘research’ he referred to claiming that all who viewed ‘indecent’ material would go on to assault someone, were torrential, lying bull which the fawning, sycophantic journalists who lovingly filmed his Hitlerite speech wholly failed to pick up on. He was just a jumped up little twerp mouthing the lines his masters would be pleased to hear, in order to get a reaction – I suspect he must have known somewhere that he was talking crap. He and people like him have authorised, effectively, murder and devastation on a scandalous scale – ‘suicide’ is a euphemism, and he must have known it.

    The clock is indeed ticking.

    ReplyDelete

  6. The implications for the IPCC

    Following the first public exposure that Operation Ore may have been a grave miscarriage of justice in the magazine PC Pro on 31 August 2005, one of the action group submitted two crime reports concerning senior National Crime Squad police officers involved in Ore to the IPCC.

    Following the initial rejection of these crime reports, the member submitted a further request for a complaint investigation into the commissioner of the IPCC. It seems that all three complaints ended up at the National Crime Squad Service Authority.

    A question that may now arise as a result of the group action is as follows. As the Operation Ore group action appeal has now been listed for the High Court, what is the relevance of an ‘independent’ police complaints body that rejected information that the High Court has since accepted – in particular detailed evidence that it had no interest in examining?

    Finally the police that ignored crime reports and complaints submitted by James Jordon (not his real name) over 7 years have now managed to change his status from that of plaintiff to defendant through the ludicrous charge of possessing a violent porn image, just weeks before the High Court appeal that he did so much to bring about.

    xxxx

    It is alleged that one of those Offices was Jim Gamble.

    ReplyDelete

  7. http://twitpic.com/1d59uj

    So many involved…

    ReplyDelete

  8. Well people of OBU you have fought and fought I have watched your sadness and seen your courage. People wrongly accused ,you have lost your homes and your will to live. But now there is a light and you have the chance to speak up and tell of the dreadful wrong that Jim Gamble and his team did to you. I wish you well and will be thinking of you when you have your day in Court.

    I dedicate this song to you…It is sad…but it is also about a fighter. Good luck to you all.

    http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xtf0f_springsteen-streets-of-philadelphia_music

    ReplyDelete

  9. OBU you asked for anyone who knew a friendly blog to post your good news and mention your lawyer CHRIS SALTRESE.

    They don’t come more friendlier than here.

    ReplyDelete

  10. The BACKGROUND to OPERATION ORE and those who took their own lives.

    Background

    In 1999, after the US authorities sentenced Thomas Reidy, the owner of Landslide Productions, they sent lists by country through Interpol to the police in about 60 countries, giving the impression that all on each list were child pornography users, despite reservations about this back home in the US where only about 100 individuals were charged. The list contained 390,000 subscriber transactions, 35,000 of which were in the US. The country that responded to its list with the greatest enthusiasm was the United Kingdom, which launched the now notorious Operation Ore, identifing over 7,000 suspects, searching 4,283 homes, arresting 3,744, charging 1,848, resulting in 1,451 convictions, 493 cautions and nearly 1,000 left hanging about their fate. There were numerous suicides and thousands of families destroyed, including the lives of far more children than the number the police falsely claimed to have saved.

    There is now a group action underway in the United Kingdom against the police and other perpetuators of Operation Ore; however, much of the material, and in particular the evidence secured from America by the group action organizers, is generic and applicable to all countries where police raids and campaigns based on the US-supplied Landslide lists ruined lives. After the first phase of the Operation Ore group action, the organizers of Counteract will make key evidence, never before shown to the defence, available to organizers in each country where a formal class action is planned. This evidence is quite devastating as it includes amongst other issues the fact of massive credit card fraud, which had been ignored and even denied by the police and their expert witnesses. The evidence, which included the actual Landslide subscriber database and FBI files, had to be obtained secretly in the US by the Operation Ore group activists.

    ReplyDelete

  11. Notice to certain individuals on the VIP list
    The few individuals being addressed here are in positions of considerable power and influence.

    We are aware that you had no part to play in your name being included on this list. We have fought hard to establish and prove that many of the names on the list are of innocent individuals who became victims of either credit card fraud or being deliberately set up.

    However it is a fact that while thousands have been raided and ruined by the police you and a few other individuals were considered by them to be worthy of exceptional treatment, in the form of protection. This may have apparently spared you from wrongful arrest and ruin, but it has in fact compromised you and by now you may be aware that as a result you have become a Jumping Jack of the police. Even if no favours have been asked of you, or you have given none, the moment it is revealed that your name was on the VIP list, your reputation will be ruined as no-one will believe that you were not protected because of your power, or, in a few cases, great wealth.

    That the list is now in hands outside of, and hostile to, the police puts your reputation at great risk.

    The purpose of this message is not to broadcast what may be obvious, but quite different and very specific.

    Some of you (very few) are now coming under pressure to stop any action that could make it known that you have been compromised. In other words, you are being encouraged to assist the police in stopping any action against them that could damage your reputation also. If you do this, you will be committing an act of grave injustice – perhaps even an act of infamy.

    ReplyDelete

  12. cont…

    You have a final opportunity to do something truly honourable. Speak up now and say that you were given protection against publication of a crime that you did not commit in the first instance and given protection that you neither wanted nor asked for.

    The VIP list is explained below.

    The VIP list

    The American and British police have compiled a list of influential individuals who have been accused of being sex offenders, falsely or otherwise. Known as the VIP list, ‘very important perverts’, the individuals on this list have not been proceeded against by the police because they may be useful to them, or already are. The list is comprised almost entirely of men, although there are a few influential women on it whose men folk, husbands, sons or other family members, have been accused, thus creating the potential to compromise them also.

    The majority of the names appear to be in influential positions in the media. The accusations range from mere allegations of sex abuse, not proceeded with, to allegations which resulted in police investigation, but were not processed on to subsequent trial, and allegations of possession of child pornography. All have the potential to ruin the named individuals, making the list a powerful device for compromising them.

    One of the worst aspects of the list is that police or their agents can set up a desirable target – that is, some powerful person who could be useful to them – by organizing an allegation of sex abuse against them.

    What is not clear is whether the police have informed all or most on the list that they have been identified as being ‘accused’ persons, although a few of the media individuals have published extremely biased opinions on the extent of ‘stranger danger’ and sex abuse, which could suggest that they are toeing a party line. If this is so, they are helping maintain a climate of fear that results in more resources going to police and child protection agencies.

    ReplyDelete

  13. cont…

    The list also contains the names of senior politicians and of individuals who are extremely wealthy.

    A question raised by the discovery of the list is whether it preceded the infamous Landslide list or was based on it. The Landslide list of ‘protected names’, was made up of individuals in high places, including the media, on the original list supplied to police forces around the world by the FBI, who were not proceeded against by the local police, at least not proceeded against in the UK. When that list was first mentioned, the police denied its existence but since the Operation Group Action acquired it they can no longer make such a denial. It is likely that the Landslide list bolstered an existing growing list of important individuals that could be compromised.

    Examples of key individuals who could be compromised are executives of major social networking Internet sites now under pressure from agents of the UK police to deploy ‘stranger danger’ panic buttons on their web sites, all those responsible for financing the police and child protection agencies, and media opinion formers.

    In addition, activists have acquired a few police files of influential individuals who were investigated by the police for specific offences involving minors. A threat to release some of these has already stopped police harassment of one group and attempts to shut down its web site.

    The knowledge of the list, has finally given activists a means of counteracting some of the worst propaganda issuing from compromised individuals. For example one fanatical former public ‘scourge of child porn downloaders’ has been informed that his name is on the list and has gone silent.

    The best way now for a child protection propagandist to get the attention of the activist group is to continue to publicly advocate stranger danger or promote witch hunt policies. It is expected that the group will shortly have a mechanism for the public to report hitherto unreported accusations against such grandstanders. It seems that predator chasers are either real or potential predators themselves or already hopelessly compromised by the police.

    ‘To catch a predator’ was a popular pastime – of ‘past’ time. We shall now see how popular a new one will be. It could be called ‘To expose a hypocrite’.

    Source OBU

    ReplyDelete

  14. cont…

    The list also contains the names of senior politicians and of individuals who are extremely wealthy.

    A question raised by the discovery of the list is whether it preceded the infamous Landslide list or was based on it. The Landslide list of ‘protected names’, was made up of individuals in high places, including the media, on the original list supplied to police forces around the world by the FBI, who were not proceeded against by the local police, at least not proceeded against in the UK. When that list was first mentioned, the police denied its existence but since the Operation Group Action acquired it they can no longer make such a denial. It is likely that the Landslide list bolstered an existing growing list of important individuals that could be compromised.

    Examples of key individuals who could be compromised are executives of major social networking Internet sites now under pressure from agents of the UK police to deploy ‘stranger danger’ panic buttons on their web sites, all those responsible for financing the police and child protection agencies, and media opinion formers.

    In addition, activists have acquired a few police files of influential individuals who were investigated by the police for specific offences involving minors. A threat to release some of these has already stopped police harassment of one group and attempts to shut down its web site.

    The knowledge of the list, has finally given activists a means of counteracting some of the worst propaganda issuing from compromised individuals. For example one fanatical former public ‘scourge of child porn downloaders’ has been informed that his name is on the list and has gone silent.

    The best way now for a child protection propagandist to get the attention of the activist group is to continue to publicly advocate stranger danger or promote witch hunt policies. It is expected that the group will shortly have a mechanism for the public to report hitherto unreported accusations against such grandstanders. It seems that predator chasers are either real or potential predators themselves or already hopelessly compromised by the police.

    ‘To catch a predator’ was a popular pastime – of ‘past’ time. We shall now see how popular a new one will be. It could be called ‘To expose a hypocrite’.

    Source OBU

    ReplyDelete

  15. Good morning OBU readers. You may find it strange that you are on a Madeleine Mccann blog. But believe me this is the best place for you. You are amongst friends who question the motives of Jim Gamble and his involvement in the Cover-Up of the death of Madeleine Mccann. The best place for you to have the word spread about your Court action is on the Mccann blogs…Gamble is up to his neck in this . Plus of course the chickens have yet to come home to roost on Operation Ore.

    You are being tweeted and you are also on Facebook…We have 300 readers a day from all over the world.(and thats just this one Blog) You have friends, just remember that…any info, or if you want to leave a post anon..we would love to hear from you…Get the news out there just what really happened to you people and how much you have suffered thanks to the likes of Jim Gamble.

    IRONSIDE

    ReplyDelete

  16. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/lawandorder/5727272/Operation-Ore-legal-challenge-to-child-abuse-inquiry.html

    ReplyDelete

  17. http://www.mattwardman.com/blog/2009/07/17/is-operation-ore-on-the-skids-at-last-can-we-now-roll-back-paedomania/

    Trust me I am a Police Officer…

    GAMBLE Bully of the Internet.

    ReplyDelete

  18. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article7092499.ece

    The on going war between Facebook and Gamble. Gamble has flown to Washington to insist on a panic button on Facebook…The Americans want HALLIGEN…also deeply involved in the McCann case…Will there be a deal. Panic Button for HALLIGEN:

    ReplyDelete

  19. Info on Kevin Halligen much wanted by the Americans for fraud.Halligens Court case was on March 26th…and not one word in the British Press.

    http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2009/12/mccann-detective-missing.html

    ReplyDelete

  20. CEOP renews attack on Facebook
    Alert Print Post comment ‘A chosen site for rapists and murderers?’

    By Chris Williams • Get more from this author

    Posted in Policing, 9th April 2010 10:25 GMT

    Free whitepaper – Taking control of your data demons: Dealing with unstructured content

    The chief of the national anti-paedophile agency has launched another scathing attack on Facebook, branding its refusal to publish an official “panic button” on users’ profiles as “arrogant”.

    Jim Gamble, chief executive of CEOP (the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre), publicised figures today showing more complaints to investigators about activity on Facebook.

    He said CEOP had received 252 complaints about Facebook in the first three months of this year, compared to 297 in the whole of 2009, according to reports.

    Gamble has been campaigning for several months for Facebook, increasingly the dominant social network, to agree to publish a CEOP-branded panic button. It has steadfastly refused, arguing its own reporting procedures are effective, and rejecting calls from the Home Secretary to comply with CEOP’s demands.

    Gamble said: “None [of the 252 reports received this year by CEOP] came direct from Facebook. If their system is so robust and they are receiving so many reports and concerns from young people, then where are they?”

    The panic button sends users to a CEOP page containing advice on everyday internet security threats and bullying, inappropriate content, as well as a link to report suspicious approaches to investigators.

    “Is Facebook so arrogant that it does not matter what the collective child protection community think?” Gamble said in a briefing with reporters.

    “Do they want to be the website of choice for bullies, for dangerous individuals, for rapists and murderers?”

    The latest attack comes ahead of a meeting between CEOP and Facebook in Washington DC next week. So far, Microsoft and Bebo have agreed to publish the button, although this week it was revealed that AOL is likely to shut down the latter because it has proved a commercial failure.

    The media pressure on Facebook from CEOP has been extreme this year, with Gamble taking to the airwaves immediately after the conviction of Ashleigh Hall’s killer.

    It seems very unlikely that she would have been helped by CEOP’s panic button however. The 17-year-old naively agreed to a real world meeting with a Facebook friend, believing he was a teenage boy. In fact he was 33-year-old convicted sex offender Peter Chapman, who the police had lost track of.

    News Corp-owned social network MySpace, which has a high proportion of teenagers among its user base compared to Facebook, has not been subject to the same intense public criticism from CEOP, although it has so far also declined to publish the panic button

    Source :The Register

    ReplyDelete

  21. I have twittered Martin Brunt and asked him while he is so busy reporting on Jim Gamble in Washington, why is he also not reporting on the up and coming hearing with regards to Operation Ore?. As usual the SILENT treatment from Martin.AND he calls himself a Crime reporter…

    ReplyDelete

  22. http://www.annaraccoon.com/madeleine-mccann/colin-port-jim-gamble-jim-bates-there-be-ore-in-them-thar-irish-hills/

    ANNARACOON …and the hidden Agenda of Jim Gamble.

    ReplyDelete

  23. http://i798.photobucket.com/albums/yy263/pickiwickie/piccies/Sun_18_11_05csmall.jpg

    Innocent or Guilty plays NO part in the Agenda of Jim Gamble.

    ReplyDelete

  24. I am an Operation Ore wife. I have been threatened, abused, made homeless, lost my job, everything because of Ore. Ore was so full of lies…I have appeared on national TV to expose Ore. Gamble and his mate Turner found me and are now threatening me again.
    I was forcably sterized by the government after Ore to keep my baby. I lost my job due to guilt by association. I have done FOI’s on NSPCC and John Carr. Carr has admitted he only says what Gamble tells him to say. I got into a LIVE fight with Carr on Radio 5 about Ore- I was disconnected as soon as Carr realise who I was and said I could prove the D Notice and that the ‘click here banner’ didn’t exist.
    My husband and I were arrest while on holiday in Aug 2009. As no known adult to the family was available at 11 pm to take him, he was ‘put in care’. The police have had now had to admit they falsely arrested us…but won’t return my son… unless I want to ‘change my tune’ and admit that Jim Gamble is the ‘children’s saviour of the internet’.
    Sorry, I will not be blackmailed.
    Even the Nazi’s admit my child is suffering harm in the care of the government- including him saying he suffered sexual harm by a ‘friend’ of the foster carer
    TC

    ReplyDelete

  25. TC

    I’m totally lost for words here. There’s nothing worse than state bullying.
    Maddie’s case is much beyond the child’s death, or the criminals escaping from responsability. It’s about State deceit. Which allows the bullying. And only the bullied know what real fear is.

    Thank you, for such a sincere comment. God bless you and yours.

    ReplyDelete

  26. TC….Thank you so much for coming forward. I can only imagine how hard that must have been for you to put post these words. I am shocked to know things have gone this far. I can only suggest that many more brave women and men come forward and tell their story, HERE on this blog. The more that know ,the greater chance we have of getting the truth out there. The Interrent is a powerful tool and when used in the right way there is NO PLACE for Jim Gamble to hide.

    ReplyDelete

  27. TC

    As this blog crosses over the 26.000 hits, your message has brought tears to my eyes, and has made all worthwhile.

    Your husband has one WONDERFUL woman for a wife. You are an example that I shall respectfully look up to for the rest of my days.

    ReplyDelete

  28. TC My heart goes out to you and I cannot begin to imagine your suffering. You are a very brave lady and thank you for sharing this with us.

    I only hope that more like you come forward and expose Jim Gamble for the monster he is.

    ReplyDelete

  29. http://goodqualitywristbands.blogspot.com/

    Good morning OBU readers as you can see we have our eyes wide open on Jim Gamble. Gamble tried to help under the guise of CEOP FRAME Roert Murat.

    ReplyDelete

  30. http://ore-exposed.obu-investigators.com/Gamble%20Lies%20To%20Lords%20Committee.html

    2007…Operation Ore more background on Jim Gamble

    ReplyDelete

  31. http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/news/778905/Portuguese-cops-slammed-for-gaping-holes-in-investigation.html

    JIM GAMBLE ASSISTS once more in the cover up of Madeleine Mccann.

    ReplyDelete

  32. Did you get my last message- if yes then delete this one! Thanks TC

    ReplyDelete

  33. No, TC, this is all I got. Please do try again.

    ReplyDelete

  34. Hi blog owners and members
    Somehow my answer got lost! (probably me hitting the wrong button).
    I will summarise as so:
    1) Thank you for your kind hearted words-very nice and welcoming.
    2) When it comes to the point of this Blog. Well, I have for years been treated like a ‘nutjob’ because I said Roman Catholic Priests and Nuns were a danger to our children. I believe the latest news has borne out my real concerns and fears about this ‘organisation’.
    3) As soon as I heard the words on the News ‘Kate McFraud- devout Roman Catholic’- alarm bells went off in my head.
    I believe in true ‘child protection’- not what the UK media and ‘child protection industry’ claim. By ‘true child protection’ I believe that means we educate our children about life and the real world. We don’t suppose some ‘stranger danger’. I also as a Mother teach my children the skills of debate and teaching them ‘well, there is this view and that is that view’- present them with and then suitably let them have a point of view which I will respect. I must have ‘done something right’ as my oldest with her 14 A* GCSE’s and her 5 A* A levels is now at one of the top UK universities studying English and Journalism . My older boy wants to be a Structural Engineer.
    I believe strongly in independent thinking, self interpretation of events and that our children should not believe ‘the boogie man’ is at every corner. Many here will be surprised that I am a ‘right wing’ member of the American Republican Party. I was a deeply religious woman (from the North by the way) then Operation Ore destroyed my faith.
    With regard to this site, can anyone tell me why Kate and Gerry were not subject to a Section 47 report which is legally required in the UK?
    I will give members here a taste of what we have tolerated ‘ Well, you clearly have higher IQ’s than me- but YOU Mrs. TC ONLY have ONE Master’s Degree- I have TWO- so I WIN-that makes me BETTER than you.’ I believe that is ‘Projection’ and ‘Insecurity’ at the highest level.
    Oh and she is a ‘mate’ of Gamble. I am deeply concerned that our children are being stopped from independent thought.
    I would like to know as a concerned Mother, why were Section 47 investigations never initiated by the Leicester SS against the McFrauds about their account? We have been on holiday with friends-we never left our children alone…..between 6 adults we have probably had 3 bottles of wine between us. (I know, out of control) Reports say that was not the truth.
    I will leave you with this. I posted on another blog ‘Why I hate Ironing’.. I commented… ‘Well, I hate it and here is how I do it….iron 5 items…get a sip of wine…iron ten pieces and get half a fag’. The SS found this and that post is suddenly ‘Mother is an alcoholic chain smoker’.
    Regards
    TC

    ReplyDelete

  35. TC,

    Well TC, there are two things you’ve done that I haven’t, being a “right-wing-of-a-right-wing-party” and having a fag and ironing. I wouldn’t run the risk of grilling my lips and laugh about it to the hospital…

    About the booze… Lady, “Well, you clearly have a stronger liver than me – but YOU Mrs. TC can ONLY drink ONE bottle at a time – I drink TWO- so I WIN-that makes me BETTER than you!”

    LOLOLOLOL

    ReplyDelete

  36. TC,

    On second thouht, I apologise for the humorous reply.

    The subject is too serious. I just didn’t resist hitting on the smallness of some people’s minds.

    Hope you understand.

    ReplyDelete

  37. http://www.childrenslegalcentre.com/Legal+Advice/Child+law/childprotection/Whatisasection47enquiry

    Good morning TC and thank you for the H/T on Section 47..For those who do not know ,like myself, some information.

    TC the case is complictaed as you know and much political involvement. The McCanns have good contacts and are well protected.
    I myself believe that there was no neglect but neglect was simulated to prove abduction. If neglect did not take place then neither could abduction.
    Reading through all of their files they each say either one was sick or blame a child being sick for the reason they were not at the table one night of their stay. There was ALWAYS someone not present.

    That someone I believe sat with the children, they took it in turns. The only child left alone was Madeleine in apartment 5a. Why? because Madeleine had a sleep problem. What ever the system ,it had worked fine in Rothley so why change it when on holiday. The baby monitor was for Madeleine.

    An Independent witness Mrs Fenn heard Madeleine cry for well over an hour , screaming Daddy,daddy…wherever the Mccanns were that night they were too far away for the baby monitor to function.

    The question is why would the Mccanns and their friends let themselves be villified for neglect? In my opinion better be villified for this than what really happened to Madeleine on May 3rd.

    Moving on to ‘IRONING’ I also hate it…I smoke through out and have a LARGE gin and tonic…Wait…. I think the POLICE are at my door LOLOLO

    Glad you have a sense of humour TC because without, we would all go mad.

    ReplyDelete

  38. TC The Church and paedophilia , the truth like a leaking boat is sinking and victims are coming forward and naming priests involved. The Archbishop even has a priest who tracks paedophiles inside the church. Jehovah Witness also are rife with paedophiles, it is a place to hide . While on the outside it looks as though these people are doing Gods work but in reality they are satisfying their lust for young children.

    Tony ‘Miranda’ Blair is Bi Sexual, this is well known. Many reasons now come to light why Tony changed his faith and became a Roman Catholic and none of them have anything to do with God. The Catholic Church protect their own.

    ReplyDelete

  39. Another McCann supporter but NOT Madeleine supporter is tweeting..

    mwilliamsthomas Am pleased 2 see #Facebook have not added the Report-it button just as CEOP wanted-but have considered how people report- giving options

    Good on you Facebook…Wanted? I think MWT means ORDERED:

    ReplyDelete

  40. totallyconfused13 Apr 2010 08:37:00
    Morning All
    Wow- Sandy- you are brave- regarding comments about BLiar. Of course, many of us are aware of his ‘true colours’ and have a list- checked it twice with the names of a few of his ‘mates’.
    I might as well ‘come out now’- I am an out and proud straight woman who loves her husband. (shoot me now) But my best friend (outside my husband) is an out and proud gay man. My attitude is ‘So………’ To a big degree, sexuality doesn’t bother me. But covering up the truth…a different issue.
    Someone posted about a lack of response from Martin Brunt. I don’t know him, but can assure people that Ian Woods is open to listening. Isn’t it interesting that all the Sky Journalists I have spoken to regarding Ore (I have even had them in my home) are now flung to the outside (for example Amanda Walker suddenly is the Russia correspondent) Has anyone else looked at the Sky Discussion forums? It is dominated by ‘we have to find Madeline’. Don’t get me wrong- as a mother of 3 blond blue eyed children, I would be concerned about my child being ‘missing’ but the main posters there are all about how the gov’t isn’t helping the McFrauds enough. What about all the other children- particularly those that fall through the cracks in the ‘system’?
    Attached is another Ore discussion…..just think about what it says.
    http://www.iamthewitness.com/Operation.Ore.Truth.Out.htm
    One also has to ask about why Gamble high tailed it out of the RUC? Ask Ronnie Flanagan- no fan of Gamble. Oh and as for the above link, I have a wonderful response from Stuart Hyde’s solicitor.
    Returning to what this group is about- maybe my addled brain (must be all the ironing) has missed something- with children that young don’t sensible people a)stay in and get the food as ‘take out’ or b) put the kids to bed and then snack on some local bread, cured meats and cheeses? Or c) say, ‘it is a holiday- so what if the kids stay up late- take them with us’? I have not been to Portugal- but regularly used to holiday in the Canary Islands when my children were small. I did all of a, b and c. (The first time I nipped to the corner shop to buy some milk leaving a 10year old ‘alone’ I was in a state of panic for the full 4 minutes) Has common sense flown out the window?
    Regards
    TC

    ReplyDelete

  41. Victim SIMON BUNCE OPERATIO ORE

    Hi Sandy..here is the Transcript of another victim from your link….Simon Bunce…

    We had two victims that night…Madeleine Mccann and Simon Bunce…

    As you rightly say this programme was aired May 4th 2007…No one remembers Simon because air time was spent on the MCcanns.

    Transcript …Operation Ore……(This programme aired May 4th 2007)

    Credit card fraud cannot only threaten your finances , but at worst, threaten your reputation.

    Operation Ore, was kicked off by these raids in the U.S. two years ago.

    When an American on line site offering explicit images of children was closed down by the American authorities,the credit card details of their customers were made available to Police in the UK,to track down potential paedophiles.

    This resulted in almost fifteen hundred convictions over here. But, its since been revealed that up to fifty five thousand fraudulent ,or cloned cards may have been caught up in the ‘Sting.’

    In March 2004, Simon Bunce was arrested after his credit card details turned up in the Operation Ore Investigation.

    Question

    How did they explain what they were arresting you for?

    Simon

    They arrested me because they were accusing me of down loading,storing and incitement to distribute images of child pornography in May 1999.

    Question

    And, when they told you that,what was your reaction?

    Simon

    I was devastated, I could’nt believe it I,I thought for a moment it was a set up.

    Question

    What happened after you were arrested?

    Simon

    Well, I was held in custody for almost nine hours while they went off to my house and um exercised a warrant. They took my computers, all my work computers , all my personal computers , all my memory stick ,my cards all the floppy disks and Cds and DVDs and they forensicly examined every single one and found not ONE single image. They call it IIOC Indecent Images of Children and the whole report from the Hi tech Crime Unit said NIL IIOCs found.

    Reporter

    But it took six months before the charges were dropped.

    Question

    What were those six months like, for you and your family.

    Simon

    Shakes head and closes eyes …..Terrible, I, did’nt sleep, could’nt eat properly. I, was so conscious of any contact with anybody under the age of about twenty five. I suppose, really what I felt was, rage, anger, that they were wasting their time on someone like me, when it was patently obvious that these transactions were fraudulent.

    Reporter

    Simon hired a computer expert who had pin pointed the moment when his card details were stolen back in 1999. The card was then used to make a purchase on the American pornography site, the transaction went unoticed on Simons credit card statement at the time.

    Simon

    Because I was travelling so much, my wife would routinly open my credit card statements and pay the bills um she knew I had been in America,she saw an American transaction for 29.95 dollars, did’nt think anything of it and paid the bill and I missed it as well.

    Question

    How careful are you now about checking your statements?

    Simon

    Smiles…I check them with a microscope the moment they come in, forensically, because I’m not going to let this happen again.

    ReplyDelete

  42. totallyconfused13 Apr 2010 09:44:00
    Simon is an aquaintance. He was a complete victim of Ore…as were many people. But yet, Gamble claims everyone was ‘guilty until proven innocent’ (talk about turning human rights in the West on it’s Axis!)

    Mr. Gamble, you have blood on your hands…and alot of it.

    Let me give the readers here an example of Gamble:
    ‘Due to Operation Ore, 102 children have been protected’. Now what does that really mean? Having done a FOI on that statement, I can tell you EXACTLY what it means…102 children’s names were put on the ‘at risk register’due to Operation Ore raids on homes where men were victims of credit card fraud. And 3 of those 102 children were MY children.

    Given the parents confirmed behaviour, shouldn’t Sean and Amelie McCann be on some gov’t/social services monitoring list?
    Not that I am a cynic….
    TC

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *