HOLLIE GREIG HOAX ? COLEMAN ON SPIVEY

Chris Spivey arrested in 2am raid

Chris Spivey- Intel nemesis
Brilliant writer, Chris Spivey, has been arrested in a night-time raid on his home by the desperate powers-that-be.
Chris, who is edging ever and ever closer to the truth about the Woolwich hoax, has obviously rattled the filth who run this country , and they’ve been forced into a pathetic rearguard action by arresting him and taking away his computer equipment.
Of course, if they think that’s going to stop the truth about the twisted British Establishment  emerging, they must be even thicker than they look.
According to Chris’s website:
” Chris was ILLEGALLY arrested with a warrant for harassment , now not being privy to the so called warrant if it’s not a wet signature and also if it’s not issued under oath it is an unlawful document and as such he has been illegally detained under false pretences , nothing new there then .”
” Just after 2 am 6 police entered Chris’s property with a so called warrant , if he had refused they would have  forced entry (bit like our MP’s do with kids) but hey that’s ok to fuck the nation’s kids and then arrest someone for revealing it , those six (sick) so called policemen who took part in this are breaking their own oath , as no harassment or breach of the peace has or had taken place .
It would seem it is easier to enter a honest man’s home and arrest him on a trumped up charge than it is to arrest the likes of Camoron , Clegg , Blair , Brittain , Mandelson (“I said a mouse not a gerbil up my ass”) along with I have my eye on you Brown (“Which eye is that said Alice looking through a glass full of shit”) and the other peados who reside in the house of shit . Not only does he have his young daughter and a 1 year old grandchild on the premises who were verbally abused by some wanker dressed in a uniform , all her possessions were rifled through and they attempted also to take her phone . Obviously after two hours of a bunch of retards who under the disguise of being up-holders of the law , who having woken the child and tried to make Chris sign for the computer stuff they had stolen , (as harassment laws do not cover electronic devices unless they are used to communicate with someone directly to cause the said harassment )  his daughter Stacey was obviously very upset , whereupon our brave boys in blue told her to “Grow up” .
To the boys in blue (men in tights) when the shit hits the fan and you hear a knock it wont be half a dozen it will be 100′s if not 1000′s knocking on your door and God help you then , as the old diatribe “I was only doing my job” wont sit well when your time comes .
Prohibition of harassment.
(1)A person must not pursue a course of conduct—
(a)which amounts to harassment of another, and
(b)which he knows or ought to know amounts to harassment of the other.
(2)For the purposes of this section, the person whose course of conduct is in question ought to know that it amounts to harassment of another if a reasonable person in possession of the same information would think the course of conduct amounted to harassment of the other.
(3)Subsection (1) does not apply to a course of conduct if the person who pursued it shows—
(a)that it was pursued for the purpose of preventing or detecting crime,
(b)that it was pursued under any enactment or rule of law or to comply with any condition or requirement imposed by any person under any enactment, or
(c)that in the particular circumstances the pursuit of the course of conduct was reasonable.
Offence of harassment.
(1)A person who pursues a course of conduct in breach of section 1 is guilty of an offence.
(2)A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable on summary conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, or a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale, or both.
Civil remedy.
(1)An actual or apprehended breach of section 1 may be the subject of a claim in civil proceedings by the person who is or may be the victim of the course of conduct in question.
(2)On such a claim, damages may be awarded for (among other things) any anxiety caused by the harassment and any financial loss resulting from the harassment.
(3)Where—
(a)in such proceedings the High Court or a county court grants an injunction for the purpose of restraining the defendant from pursuing any conduct which amounts to harassment, and
(b)the plaintiff considers that the defendant has done anything which he is prohibited from doing by the injunction,
the plaintiff may apply for the issue of a warrant for the arrest of the defendant.
(4)An application under subsection (3) may be made—
(a)where the injunction was granted by the High Court, to a judge of that court, and
(b)where the injunction was granted by a county court, to a judge or district judge of that or any other county court.
(5)The judge or district judge to whom an application under subsection (3) is made may only issue a warrant if—
(a)the application is substantiated on oath, and
(b)the judge or district judge has reasonable grounds for believing that the defendant has done anything which he is prohibited from doing by the injunction.
(6)Where—
(a)the High Court or a county court grants an injunction for the purpose mentioned in subsection (3)(a), and
(b)without reasonable excuse the defendant does anything which he is prohibited from doing by the injunction,
he is guilty of an offence.
(7)Where a person is convicted of an offence under subsection (6) in respect of any conduct, that conduct is not punishable as a contempt of court.
(8)A person cannot be convicted of an offence under subsection (6) in respect of any conduct which has been punished as a contempt of court.
(9)A person guilty of an offence under subsection (6) is liable—
(a)on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, or a fine, or both, or
(b)on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, or a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum, or both.
Putting people in fear of violence.
(1)A person whose course of conduct causes another to fear, on at least two occasions, that violence will be used against him is guilty of an offence if he knows or ought to know that his course of conduct will cause the other so to fear on each of those occasions.
(2)For the purposes of this section, the person whose course of conduct is in question ought to know that it will cause another to fear that violence will be used against him on any occasion if a reasonable person in possession of the same information would think the course of conduct would cause the other so to fear on that occasion.
(3)It is a defence for a person charged with an offence under this section to show that—
(a)his course of conduct was pursued for the purpose of preventing or detecting crime,
(b)his course of conduct was pursued under any enactment or rule of law or to comply with any condition or requirement imposed by any person under any enactment, or
(c)the pursuit of his course of conduct was reasonable for the protection of himself or another or for the protection of his or another’s property.
(4)A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable—
(a)on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, or a fine, or both, or
(b)on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, or a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum, or both.
(5)If on the trial on indictment of a person charged with an offence under this section the jury find him not guilty of the offence charged, they may find him guilty of an offence under section 2.
(6)The Crown Court has the same powers and duties in relation to a person who is by virtue of subsection (5) convicted before it of an offence under section 2 as a magistrates’ court would have on convicting him of the offence.

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1997/40/contents 

To all intents and purposes the law about harassment is a Civil matter and therefore should be dealt with by a Civil court , harassment is a bit of a grey area (something akin to the lack of grey matter in plods head) and not a criminal offence and as such should be dealt with by the proper authority and the issue of a warrant is unlawful , unless a previous court order has been broken .
Chris has just been arrested for harrassment, apparently under section 32, because he wouldn’t sign under section 23. 6 police felt the need to search his flat and Stacey and Clay’s room…. looking for cctv footage , well bad luck as you were on “Candid Camera” plod so you can deny that in court also its now safely in several different countries .
This is harassment section 23.6   http://www.neiladdison.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/law/act.htm which refused to sign , so they arrested him under harassment section 32 http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/s_to_u/sentencing_manual/racially_or_religiously_aggravated_harassment/ which if you can find any racial or religious aggravated harassment on this site please let us know .
We look forward to hearing from Chris about this disgusting incident as soon as he is released.
In the meantime, we have a message for the scum who run this country from behind the shadows.
We’ve told you before and we’ll tell you again.
Arrest, kill, lie, perjure, rant, scream, abuse, vilify.
Do whatever you f*****g well want.
It’s way to late now.
The truth will out anyway.
It’s only a matter of time.

HOLLIE GREIG HOAX? NONCE WATCH ,WHAT DID KEN CLARK DO?

ARTICLE: Four new historic child abuse cases referred to police by Home Office

An internal review of hundreds of thousands of Home Office files found 13 previously undisclosed “items of alleged child abuse” last year. Four had not been referred to the police.

Four previously unknown cases of historic sex abuse have been referred to the police by Home Office officials in recent months, The Daily Telegraph can disclose.
An internal review of hundreds of thousands of Home Office files found 13 previously undisclosed “items of alleged child abuse” last year.
The Home Office said that nine of the 13 cases had been reported to the police – including four which involved the department’s officials.
However, the remaining four were overlooked by civil servants – and have now been reported to the Metropolitan Police.
The cases were unearthed by an internal review ordered by the Home Office’s permanent secretary Mark Sedwill in February last year, months after the scandal involving former Liberal MP Cyril Smith broke.

The review – which was carried out by an independent investigator from HM Revenue and Customs – trawled through 746,000 files between 1979 and1999, and uncovered the 13 instances of alleged child abuse.
A summary of the review, which was made public after a Freedom of Information request, said: “This work identified 13 items of information about alleged child abuse, including 4 cases involving Home Office staff.
“Nine of these items of information, including all of the cases involving Home Office staff, were either already known to the Police or were reported to them by the Home Office at the time.
“The Investigator considers that the remaining 4 items of information are likely to be of limited value, as they are either of doubtful credibility or involve the use of a single profile indicator to identify a potential offender.
“However it is recommended that the information is passed to the Police for a proper assessment as this falls within their remit.”
The Home Office said that all the recommendations had now been implemented, which meant they have been referred to the Police.
The review also said that it had “identified 11 centrally recorded files from the 1980s relating to the Paedophile Information Exchange, all of which had been destroyed”.
It added: “The recorded file titles, together with media reports of events at the time, give some indication of the probable contents of these files from which the Investigator has concluded that their destruction was consistent with applicable record retention policies.”
It concluded: “The independent investigator is satisfied that the Home Office did pass on to the appropriate authorities any information received about child abuse in the period 1979 to 1999 which was credible and which had realistic potential for further investigation.
“The investigator believes that the risk of any undisclosed material remaining in files form that period is extremely low.”
Simon Danczuk, the Labour MP for Rochdale who has been campaigning on historic child abuse, questioned why the Home Office had not passed on the cases to the police earlier.
He said: “It’s never the job of the Home Office to try and determine what constituted potential evidence, that’s the job of the police and the Crown Prosecution Service.
“The public will think that people in the Home Office were withholding information from the police which could have led to the successful prosecution of child sex abusers.
“Had the evidence been passed to the police at the time they might have been able to link it to other information in their possession and build a case against someone.”
He added: “The public are left wondering why the Home Office didn’t pass on the four cases to the police when they initially received the information, some years ago.
“The more we delve into historic child sex abuse and the role of the Home Office the more concerns are raised. This is why we now need an independent overarching enquiry into historic child sex abuse.”
A Metropolitan Police spokesman said it was considering a request for comment from The Daily Telegraph, but could not comment at the time of going to press.
A Home Office spokesman said: “In response to concerns raised in Parliament and the media relating to the handling by the Department of historical allegations of abuse, the Permanent Secretary commissioned an independent review of all relevant papers received by the Department between 1979 to 1999 to identify any information received and the outcome.
“The review concluded the Home Office acted appropriately, referring information received during this period to the relevant authorities.
“The Department has now received a request for further information from the Chair of the Home Affairs Select Committee, Keith Vaz.
“It would be inappropriate to comment further until we have responded to the Chair’s request. We will respond in due course.”
SOURCE: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10944421/Four-new-historic-child-abuse-cases-referred-to-police-by-Home-Office.html

  WHAT DID KEN CLARK DO ? 

BEN FELLOWS?

HOLLIE GRIEG HOAX? NONCES BE WARNED THEY ARENT KIDS FOR EVER

Are you prepared to take the risk of abusing a child today! We grow up and come looking for you! Be warned

HOLLIE GREIG HOAX? OSBORNE AND THE MADAM,MADAM ARRESTED ,WHATS NEXT DEATH?

HOLLIE GREIG HOAX NONCE WARS ARRESTED FOR POSTING A PICTURE: ALL RAPES AND MURDER SOLVED

A woman was arrested today after posting a photograph on Twitter of chancellor George Osborne at her flat when she worked as a madame at an escort agency.
Natalie Rowe posted this photo on Twitter just two days ago:
rowe osborne
Then today Natalie was arrested by the police for“abusive behaviour”:
rowe osborne1
Natalie’s home was also searched last year by police after she tried to publish her memoirs in which she mentions Osborne took cocaine and used her services as a dominatrix called Miss Whiplash:
Is any more proof needed that our police are being used to protect politicians’ reputations rather than catching criminals?

HOLLIE GREIG HOAX? SCOTTISH INDEPENDENCE FAT MAN NEWS

Scottish independence: Yes sheep copy Scotland’s ‘jolly fat man’ Alex Salmond who brought politics into sport by his crass flag waving stunt at the Royal box in Wimbledon, his unthinking sheep are trying to do the same at Commonwealth Games, another bad Nationalist plan which has now imploded


Dear All
It seems that despite calls for a non political Commonwealth Games, the Nationalist side has no intention of doing so.
The Yes side have been carrying Scotland Flags with Yes written on them in a rather silly planned co-ordinated fashion using Facebook.
Scotland’s ‘jolly fat man’ Alex Salmond has been hoping for a Yes bounce, so far the public have ignored him.
Salmond wants to whip up Nationalist pride with the irony that he doesn’t give a toss about the Scottish people.
Now, the Yes side is angry that fans attending Glasgow Green have been told them to remove their Yes badges.
Some argue this is an infringement of their right of expression. Freedom of expression is a human right, and should be protected; this however doesn’t apply in this case. When Yes supporters visit an venue, they agree to abide the rules of the event.
If that means they don’t permit Yes badges or No badges, that is the rule, and the same rules should apply to anyone.
Spectators were told to take off the button badges at the gates by security guards who told them they ‘represent a protest’.
You could argue the merits of that definition, however, the Games and associated events are deemed non political.
Allegedly some people were reportedly told they could wear the badges if they were hidden from view, this is a compromise, what isn’t acceptable is if they are allowed in then choose to break their word.
One of the Glasgow 2014 venue rules states that no flags are permitted within a venue; or the vicinity of the venue if they are associated with causes, organisations or affiliations.
That is very clear, the Yes side thinks that they have been clever, as we keep seeing, they despite coming up with little badly thought-out plans continually fall flat on their face.
Glasgow resident Neil Patton said:
“My Yes badge is not offensive, it is not a protest – it simply represents my personal view.”
Well, Mr. Patton met someone working in a security position who will recognising his right, also recognised that the rules are rules, no matter if some people don’t like them. He therefore doesn’t have a legitimate complaint.
A spokesman for the Yes Scotland group said:
“Organisers quite rightly want to keep politics out of the Games.”
Earlier in the Games, a pro-independence spectator was ejected from Tollcross swimming centre for holding up a Saltire with a Yes slogan on it. If I was doing security, I would have offered them a choice, have the flag confiscated or leave with it.
No other options would be made available.
This is a non political Commonwealth Games and it should remain so, complaining about being caught breaking the rules is rather feeble.
Yours sincerely
George Laird 
The Campaign for human Rights at Glasgow University 

STOP PRESS CHRIS SPIVEY ILLEGALLY ARRESTED

  • ChrisSpivey – The World Put Right

    chrisspivey.org/

    5 hours ago – Chris Spivey ILLEGALLY arrested. Chris was ILLEGALLY arrested with a warrant for harassment , now not being privy to the so called warrant if …

    You’ve visited this page 2 times. Last visit: 11/04/14
  • Chris Spivey arrested in 2am raid | thecolemanexperience

    thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/…/chrisspiveyarrested-in-2am-ra…

    7 hours ago – Brilliant writer, Chris Spivey, has been arrested in a night-time raid on his home by the desperate powers-that-be. Chris, who is edging ever and …

  • chris spivey arrested for harassment. – guerrilla democracy 

    guerrillademocracy.blogspot.com/…/chrisspiveyarrested-for-harassmen…

    by Matthew Taylor – 6 hours ago – The inevitable has happened and Chris Spivey, the alternative media’s leading on-line journalist has been arrested for harassment.

  • Christopher D Spivey | Facebook

    www.facebook.com/pages/Christopher-D-Spivey/153828944737011

    Christopher D Spivey. … I did a picture of Nick and although I am not artistic like Chrisis,. A real … DADS BEEN ARRESTED CAN U ALL INBOX ME ASAP.

  • Chris Spivey (ChrisSpivey3) on Twitter

    https://twitter.com/ChrisSpivey3

    The latest from Chris Spivey (@ChrisSpivey3). Welcome. … Chris has just beenarrested for harrassment, apparently under section 32,… http://fb.me/37EwsGycK.

  • Chris spivey arrested in Uk – Godlike Productions

    www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message2606012/pg1

    10 hours ago – 8 posts

    At 2am this morning Chris Spivey of Chris Spivey.org was arrested because he mentions on his blog that the Woolwich alledged beheading …

  • Chris spivey has been arrested – David Icke’s Official Forums

    www.davidicke.com › … › Main Forums › Today’s News

    8 hours ago – Looks like his articles are having some impact! http://chrisspivey.org/ “Attention we have a situation…. Chris has just been arrested for …

  • Chris Spivey arrested in 2am raid | TheFlippinTruth

    theflippintruth.wordpress.com/2014/…/chrisspiveyarrested-in-2am-raid…

    6 hours ago – Chris Spivey– Intel nemesis. Brilliant writer, Chris Spivey, has beenarrested in a night-time raid on his home by the desperate powers-that-be.

  • the tap

    the-tap.blogspot.com/

    Spivey arrested at home 2am. Hi Tap,. Just after 2am this morning Chris Spivey’shome was raided by six uniformed police and he was arrested for harassment.

  • Chris was ILLEGALLY arrested with a warrant for harassment , now not being privy to the so called warrant if it’s not a wet signature and also if it’s not issued under oath it is an unlawful document and as such he has been illegally detained under false pretenses , nothing new there then .

    zRxFMo0mfvQ   Just after 2 am 6 police entered Chris’s property with a so called warrant , if he had refused they would have  forced entry (bit like our MP’s do with kids) but hey that’s ok to fuck the nation’s kids and then arrest someone for revealing it , those six (sick) so called policemen who took part in this are breaking their own oath , as no harassment or breach of the peace has or had taken place . It would seem it is easier to enter a honest man’s home and arrest him on a trumped up charge than it is to arrest the likes of Camoron , Clegg , Blair , Brittain , Mandelson (“I said a mouse not a gerbil up my ass”) along with I have my eye on you Brown (“Which eye is that said Alice looking through a glass full of shit”) and the other peados who reside in the house of shit . Not only does he have his young daughter and a 1 year old grandchild on the premises who were verbally abused by some wanker dressed in a uniform , all her possessions were rifled through and they attempted also to take her phone . Obviously after two hours of a bunch of retards who under the disguise of being up-holders of the law , who having woken the child and tried to make Chris sign for the computer stuff they had stolen , (as harassment laws do not cover electronic devices unless they are used to communicate with someone directly to cause the said harassment )  his daughter Stacey was obviously very upset , whereupon our brave boys in blue told her to “Grow up” . To the boys in blue (men in tights) when the shit hits the fan and you hear a knock it wont be half a dozen it will be 100′s if not 1000′s knocking on your door and God help you then , as the old diatribe “I was only doing my job” wont sit well when your time comes .
    Prohibition of harassment.
    (1)A person must not pursue a course of conduct—
    (a)which amounts to harassment of another, and
    (b)which he knows or ought to know amounts to harassment of the other.
    (2)For the purposes of this section, the person whose course of conduct is in question ought to know that it amounts to harassment of another if a reasonable person in possession of the same information would think the course of conduct amounted to harassment of the other.
    (3)Subsection (1) does not apply to a course of conduct if the person who pursued it shows—
    (a)that it was pursued for the purpose of preventing or detecting crime,
    (b)that it was pursued under any enactment or rule of law or to comply with any condition or requirement imposed by any person under any enactment, or
    (c)that in the particular circumstances the pursuit of the course of conduct was reasonable.
    Offence of harassment.
    (1)A person who pursues a course of conduct in breach of section 1 is guilty of an offence.
    (2)A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable on summary conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, or a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale, or both.
    Civil remedy.
    (1)An actual or apprehended breach of section 1 may be the subject of a claim in civil proceedings by the person who is or may be the victim of the course of conduct in question.
    (2)On such a claim, damages may be awarded for (among other things) any anxiety caused by the harassment and any financial loss resulting from the harassment.
    (3)Where—
    (a)in such proceedings the High Court or a county court grants an injunction for the purpose of restraining the defendant from pursuing any conduct which amounts to harassment, and
    (b)the plaintiff considers that the defendant has done anything which he is prohibited from doing by the injunction,
    the plaintiff may apply for the issue of a warrant for the arrest of the defendant.
    (4)An application under subsection (3) may be made—
    (a)where the injunction was granted by the High Court, to a judge of that court, and
    (b)where the injunction was granted by a county court, to a judge or district judge of that or any other county court.
    (5)The judge or district judge to whom an application under subsection (3) is made may only issue a warrant if—
    (a)the application is substantiated on oath, and
    (b)the judge or district judge has reasonable grounds for believing that the defendant has done anything which he is prohibited from doing by the injunction.
    (6)Where—
    (a)the High Court or a county court grants an injunction for the purpose mentioned in subsection (3)(a), and
    (b)without reasonable excuse the defendant does anything which he is prohibited from doing by the injunction,
    he is guilty of an offence.
    (7)Where a person is convicted of an offence under subsection (6) in respect of any conduct, that conduct is not punishable as a contempt of court.
    (8)A person cannot be convicted of an offence under subsection (6) in respect of any conduct which has been punished as a contempt of court.
    (9)A person guilty of an offence under subsection (6) is liable—
    (a)on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, or a fine, or both, or
    (b)on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, or a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum, or both.
    Putting people in fear of violence.
    (1)A person whose course of conduct causes another to fear, on at least two occasions, that violence will be used against him is guilty of an offence if he knows or ought to know that his course of conduct will cause the other so to fear on each of those occasions.
    (2)For the purposes of this section, the person whose course of conduct is in question ought to know that it will cause another to fear that violence will be used against him on any occasion if a reasonable person in possession of the same information would think the course of conduct would cause the other so to fear on that occasion.
    (3)It is a defence for a person charged with an offence under this section to show that—
    (a)his course of conduct was pursued for the purpose of preventing or detecting crime,
    (b)his course of conduct was pursued under any enactment or rule of law or to comply with any condition or requirement imposed by any person under any enactment, or
    (c)the pursuit of his course of conduct was reasonable for the protection of himself or another or for the protection of his or another’s property.
    (4)A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable—
    (a)on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, or a fine, or both, or
    (b)on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, or a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum, or both.
    (5)If on the trial on indictment of a person charged with an offence under this section the jury find him not guilty of the offence charged, they may find him guilty of an offence under section 2.
    (6)The Crown Court has the same powers and duties in relation to a person who is by virtue of subsection (5) convicted before it of an offence under section 2 as a magistrates’ court would have on convicting him of the offence.

    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1997/40/contents 

    To all intents and purposes the law about harassment is a Civil matter and therefore should be dealt with by a Civil court , harassment is a bit of a grey area (something akin to the lack of grey matter in plods head) and not a criminal offence and as such should be dealt with by the proper authority and the issue of a warrant is unlawful , unless a previous court order has been broken .
    Chris has just been arrested for harrassment, apparently under section 32, because he wouldn’t sign under section 23. 6 police felt the need to search his flat and Stacey and Clay’s room…. looking for cctv footage , well bad luck as you were on “Candid Camera” plod so you can deny that in court also its now safely in several different countries .
    This is harassment section 23.6   http://www.neiladdison.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/law/act.htm which refused to sign , so they arrested him under harassment section 32 http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/s_to_u/sentencing_manual/racially_or_religiously_aggravated_harassment/ which if you can find any racial or religious aggravated harassment on this site please let us know .
  • HOLLIE GRIEG HOAX? NONCE WARS SATANIC ABUSE HOLLAND

    nglish vile Injustice System wrecked and now torn to pieces covering up horrific satanic child abuse, EXPOSED AND VILE, prosecute THEM NOW!

    25-07-2014 04:10

    Injustice ENGLISH AND CORRUPTION IN COVERING UP KIDNAPPING AND HORRIFIC ABUSE OF OUR DAUGHTERS AND DEMI NIRVANA VAN DEN BRINK

    information and documents recieved, English courts and English police BANGED TO RIGHTS in the most solid form possible.NOW FREE DEMI AND NIRVANA TODAY YOU VILE CORRUPT SCUM!
    This must send the vile former police detective and his sick incest / abuse family to jail for 15 years plus, another of his victims he horrificly abused and then threatend to keep her mouth shut.
    No coinicidence That She allso comes out of a incest / abuse family in  Zoetermeer, Holland, the vile satanic pedophile ex detective Anton Wijers? Who runs the child abuse ring in Lake Zoetermeer has allso abused her two young children and used to go to a child care center day to abuse them.
     
    Australian, American, and English police, together with Interpol have all received the tape recording i sent them were in the abused mother tells of horrific scenes and abuse All which would shock many people who listen to it.
     
    Of course we have not forgotten the court of Amsterdam were they corrupt hearings held against me to try and inprison me again or get me put in a Nut House to cover up this satanic child horror.
     
    They have been caught in doing this as i recorded two of the illegal corrupt court hearings and released the tapes to several at different police units as well as Interpol, Lyon and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
     
    I give the court or Amsterdam 4 days exactly to contact me directly, FREE DEMI AND NIRVANA or everybody would be hearing English corrupt judges trying to set me up and covering up vile Satanic child abuse.
    They can receive prison sentences high and it looks like two foreign police units would be doing them for this, THEY ARE BANGED TO RIGHTS totally illegal in court hearings against me.
     
    Injustice ENGLISH AND CORRUPTION IN COVERING UP KIDNAPPING AND HORRIFIC ABUSE OF OUR DAUGHTERS AND DEMI NIRVANA VAN DEN BRINK, BANGED TO RIGHTS AND FULLY EXPOSED IN THIS HORRIFIC SHOCKING CASE
     
    Note this please people the Dutch police officer Sander Vreeswijk who abused and killed Milly Boele a young English girl and inocent allso comes out of this horror police abuse ring, his aunty is allso a English solicitor called Yvonne Yvonne de Wagenaar Wagenaar.It was like so many in this abuse she slightly changed her name.     
     
     
    The mother of C. is threatened by telephone by WW of the horror house that if the mother would not have to worry that I would disappear from view – that C. would lose her children.
     
    C. has also had contact with WW sometime in the horror house itself – and then C. was told by WW – you stay but Rene perhaps you can pick which you can then pass on to us .. info los
     
    The ex C. (the father of her eldest son, E.) does exactly the same – threatening that her children be taken away if they would go on with me ..
     
     
    ================================================== ===
     
    This I told you last time .. Here’s literally what CHER SELF told …. 
     
    6 – January 2013
    Cher Hersbach

     
    I just heard from my mother
     

    My grandfather (aad cordia) which (when I was a baby) abused his stepdaughter (Annet) NUDE pictures he had in his wallet. My grandfather who was due to his work (captain on a ship) regularly elsewhere in the world and he has Gaby (there is a difference in age of around 56 years) met in eastern empire when Gaby 12 YEARS!!

    Rene Voogt

     
    yeah not so strange
     
    it just sits in your family
     
    19:29

     
     
    Cher Hersbach

     
    My grandfather gore abuser who has brought to Gaby Netherlands and they got married when she was 30 and had a son together metmijn grandfather. Gaby had a daughter by another man, and this is my GORE ABUSE OPA also sexually abused
     
    My mother saw him last when I was a baby, and then only AFTER 13 years again
     

    Rene Voogt

     
    and your mother – try this alemaal but keep some in the background, I have the idea … why she told this mean? What can you do with this? different than you thought it
     

    Cher Hersbach

     
    This goorlap was living in Drenthe. We have been going there once, but I was getting sick and my mother and uncle supporters and his wife have gone that day and I was with him ONLY
     
    and what happened then you can fill yourself anyway?>
     

    Rene Voogt

     
    ohh
     
    can guess what happened there then
     
    but estimates
     
    WHY
     
    told that cunt that all so spontaneous that you continue NOTHING TO PARTICIPATE
     
    different – crazy to do with it because you can hurt yourself
     
    Well you do not see what she does
     
    I do not follow you hear
     

    Cher Hersbach

     
    I GO there is something to do with
     
    I go there as a mail throw out

    Cher Hersbach

     
    I’m now completely against the will of my mother
     
    yet I help
     

    Rene Voogt

     
    WHY SAY YOU DA AGAINST ME??
     

    Cher Hersbach

     
    I’m going to mail this so am Frides ee
     

    Rene Voogt

     
    YOU WILL NEED RAPIDO THINK WHAT YOU WANT TO GO BUSINESS
     
    BECAUSE I PLAY THIS DOES NOT COUNT IT’S EASY WISSELVALIIGE
     
    I WANT YOUR HELP
     
    I WANT YOU TO ASSIST
     
    I WANT TO HAVE THE UPPER LOWER STONE
     
    I AM HONEST AND LAW BY SEA
     
    BUT I DO NOT LET ME THINK A LOT JOB, GIVE ADVICE, THEN TO DISCOVER ALL THE LOST TIME AND EFFORT WAS
     
    that it is difficult – I know like no other … But I’m not vouch between two fires of which on the one clarification will, and the other just wants to keep everything in that cover-up
     
    Your mother is in this (unfortunately) a determining factor that is able to stand between YOU happiness
     

    Cher Hersbach

     
    That’s too bad for my mother
     
    I will be arriving however beschuldegingen when I SURE know
     

    Cher Hersbach

     
    I think my mother a lot hypocrite devoured
     

    Cher Hersbach

     
    I need to mail her that I’m not sure that I am abused by anton so they can talk. Wilma and Anton
     

    Rene Voogt

     
    excuse me
     
    treasure …. that HAG makes you completely nuts!!! She’ll give you back every finger (because you have no one else around you) and you then trust it again completely … Mar meanwhile she does nothing but make sure YOU STILL STANDING
     
    So you have a choice

    Lees meer: http://citiziens-arrests-in-holland.webnode.com/news/dutch-vile-injustice-system-wrecked-and-now-torn-to-pieces-covering-up-horrific-satanic-child-abuse-exposed-and-vile-now-prosecute-them-/
    Creëer gratis uw eigen website: http://www.webnode.nl