Aberdeen minister charged over alleged child assault
52-year-old denies allegation
The opinion was commissioned by Tony Bennett [solicitor]
Political Assistant to Jeffrey Titford MEP [UK Independence Party].
The opinion given is that of Michael Shrimpton Esq. Barrister, who can be contacted via his Chambers:
Francis Taylor Building
Michael Shrimpton, Tony Bennett, Jeffrey Titford MEP and UKIP have agreed that this opinion can be used free of any charge in the defence of Britain against the imposition of Foreign laws alien to British Law, The British Constitution and British standards.
Should you wish to make a contribution for the use of this opinion or in support of this campaign it would be most welcome – Please make cheques payable to:
UKIP Metric Martyr Fund,
C/o Tony Bennett [solicitor],
Rooms 1 & 2, Rochester House,
145 New London Road,
Should you wish to join UKIP and support their efforts to defend Britain against foreign and alien rule, against the wishes of The British peoples and in contravention of The British Constitution, please address your enquiry via Tony Bennett – address as above.
All funds raised by ‘The UK Independence Campaign Metric Martyr Fund’ will be fully accounted and will be used to assist in the prosecution of the right of British citizens to deal in Imperial Measurements, as is their right under law, free of harassment as a result of illegal attempts to impose Foreign Laws alien to British Common Law. It seems likely that the first case to require assistance will be of a greengrocer in Sunderland who will be prosecuting Sunderland Council for the return of his scales removed illegally by a Sunderland Trading Standards apparatchick.
Your support would be most welcome.
with the full authority of the solicitors aforementioned.
You may download this information and use it with no further permission required.
Should you have any further queries or require facts on any other aspect of the corrupt, undemocratic, over bureaucratised centralised European Dictatorship known as the EU and the awesome damage being to these United Kingdoms by the EU please do not hesitate to contact me:
Greg Lance – Watkins,
Cynulliad i Gymru
[trans.: THE WELSH ASSEMBLY],
c/o Glance Back Books,
17 Upper Church Street,
On 6th July 2011, he was interviewed by BBC Newsnight and described Scotland`s record on human rights as appalling. For this shocking state of affairs, he primarily blamed Elish Angiolini, followed by Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill. Mr Hamilton goes on to strongly condemn them over the Peter Cadder case, by which approximately 76,000 people were unsafely convicted. I was one of those, denied my human rights, in direct contradiction of Scotland`s own legal commitments, by DS Drummond and DC Crowder on 12th February 2010, when they refused me the legal representation to which I was entitled when I was charged. Another glaring example of Angiolini`s and MacAskill`s utter contempt for fundamental human rights lay in the circumstances connected with the false conviction and imprisonment of Mr Al-Megrahi in the notorious Lockerbie case.
Mr Hamilton`s interview can be seen thus:-
Many observers who have been following the Hollie Greig case are at a loss to understand why the Scottish mainstream media barely ever mentions the issue, even when connected criminal cases are involved, such as those of Tim Rustige (Rusty) and mine. The police officers from Operation Yewtree seemed puzzled that at the height of the Jimmy Savile scandal that no mention or photographs at all were published in the Scottish media when his cottage in Glencoe was prominently daubed “Justice for Hollie Greig”.
One possible explanation for the existence of this blanket of secrecy may lie in the person of Peter Watson, senior partner of solicitors Levy & McRae. The firm claims to specialise in managing unwelcome publicity affecting its clients. It states that “we aim to keep our clients off the front page”. This is certainly no idle boast. It is clearly very successful in that regard.
Professor Watson acts for Elish Angiolini and personally represents First Minister Alex Salmond. Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill is a former colleague when working as a solicitor at Levy & McRae. When Chief Constable Sir Stephen House was head of Strathclyde Police, Levy & McRae represented the Police Federation of that force. Now Sir Stephen leads Police Scotland, Levy & McRae now represent the Federation covering the entire country. The firm also acts for the Scottish Prison Officers Association. Professor Watson even acts as a part-time sheriff.
Levy & McRae`s power and influence does not end there, by any means.
Professor Watson is a key advisor to Alex Salmond in his efforts to further control the Scottish media. The firm represents a good part of the media, including Scottish TV, the Daily Record, Herald Scotland and others. In fact, Levy & McRae states that it represents “the biggest names in print and broadcast media”. Is it any surprise then that issues damaging to Elish Angiolini, such as the Hollie Greig case, may never see the light of day?
It must be said that Levy & McRae has received many glowing accolades from satisfied clients and in 2008, Peter Watson, described as “brilliant”, was voted Solicitor of the Year.
All this is, no doubt, wonderful for Professor Watson and for Levy & McRae, but could any of these wide-ranging spheres of influence constitute potential conflicts of interest in the way that Scotland is governed, possible effects on policing, the justice system and matters of genuine public interest being concealed from the people of Scotland?
If I have omitted any other remaining powerful organisations or individuals in Scotland that Levy &
McRae represent, I sincerely apologise
For anyone not familiar with this exhibit, it originated with Métis artist Christi Belcourt, who was looking for a way to raise awareness about the 600+ missing or murdered Indigenous women in Canada. Her original plan was to have 600 moccasin vamps (uppers) made to symbolically represent these women.
WHEN ASKED FOR “PROOF AND EVIDENCE” OF JUST ONE DEATH WELL THE BLOGGER WENT OFF ON A RANT SAYING WE HAD ABUSED HER AND WE ARE FAKE AND HOLLIES DOCUMENTED ABUSE IS FAKE .
WHILE WE DONT DOUBT THAT THIS ABUSE DID GO ON HOW COME C OF C DONT NEED
EVIDENCE OF THAT FOR THEIR ITEMS BUT DENY HOLLIE GRIEGS EVIDENCE
DRAW YOUR OWN CONCLUSIONS BUT IT SEEMS THE SAUCE FOR THE GOOSE IS NOT SAUCE FOR THE GANDER!
Former top cop set for trial over alleged sex offences
Not guilty plea at Aberdeen Sheriff Court
AN ENGLISHMANS HOME IS HIS CASTLE
Long story short - Terry discovered a paedophile in the extended family abusing a five year old and assaulted him, the paedophile got legal aid and took Terry to court and won forcing the sale of the Armstrong home to cover his legal costs. The mortgage is with Northern Rock who took advantage of the families situation to take illegal possession of the property. Consumers need to protect their homes from illegal repossession by the banks not least state owned banks by supporting the Armstrong family in their struggle to return to their home which remains empty and derelict since their eviction on the 13th August 2008. Northern Rock bank failed to exercise due diligence when granting the mortgage in 2003 leaving the bank void of security. NRAM now refuse to comply with our 'Subject Access Request' because they want to cover up their incompetence and negligence.
Why is this important?
Eviction from family homes destroys family life and devastates communities. When a family is evicted from their home they lose their identity and place in society. The family is separated and leads to hopelessness and desperation and can lead to suicide. Terry Armstrong himself suffered PTSD and tried to take his own life.
How it will be delivered
E-mail, Facebook, Twitter, and through the media granting personnel interviews.
Press conference NRAM only have security on the dwelling but not on the surrounding adjoining garden land that is not mortgaged and the Armstrong's still own and so they plan to organise events on this land to publicise the family's plight.
Therefore, I sent all the detailed expert witness statements supporting Hollie`s allegations to Mr Tyler along with the Commissioner`s evidence confirming that Grampian Police had withheld two of these crucial supporting medical documents from the Procurator Fiscal. It is certain from the evidence provided by experts with impeccable credentials that Hollie has been the victim of rape and that she has identified her attackers and indeed, their views have been accepted by the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority in granting Hollie a financial award.
My offer, which, in the circumstances, I regard as an extremely generous and fair one, was for Angiolini to be prepared to publicly call for a proper and adequate investigation to take place into Hollie`s case. In return, I would willingly cease criticising Angiolini in public and would in fact be willing to cooperate with her in trying to ensure that such an investigation is correctly undertaken, in an effort for justice to be served and to protect Scottish children and the disabled from sexual abuse.
I have taken the position that what has happened in the past, relating to my imprisonment and Angiolini`s concern about her reputation, count for very little in comparison to the horrific ordeals suffered by Hollie and probably other children and the disabled.
I have asked nothing for myself other than the right to continue to contest against my conviction and to offer support to Rusty (Tim Rustige) who has also been treated in an extraordinarily unjust and disproportionate manner.
Elish Angiolini, self -proclaimed protector of rape victims, has declined, without explanation, the opportunity to come to the aid of such a victim, disabled and defenceless.
The next hearing in this case is to take place in Edinburgh on 18th October.
Rusty`s next hearing, an interim one at which he need not attend, is scheduled for 8th October at Aberdeen. His trial is set to take place on 4th and 5th November. Sylvia Major, Elish Angiolini and Win Dragon are set to come before the Court. I understand that there is also the prospect of Hollie`s father and brother being called. Given the weight of evidence provided by Dr Eva Harding, Dr Jack Boyle, Dr Frances Kelly, Dr Paul Carter and Detective Inspector Iain Alley and other police officers, some very interesting cross-examinations are likely to take place.
Meanwhile, one person who is definitely not going to jail is Stuart MacFarlane, whom I have mentioned in previous posts. Mr MacFarlane is a former Procurator Fiscal and a deputy to Elish Angiolini. His latest trial has been reported in the 18th September editions of the Scottish Express and the Daily Record. He was found to have been in possession of 15,000 computer images, described as “horrifying”, including sexual acts between adults, children and animals. Of course, for a magic circle member like Mr MacFarlane, this was not deemed serious enough to merit a custodial sentence.
The two articles, though no doubt correctly interpreting public sentiments, do not mention that in 2006, Macfarlane was found performing a sexual act in public with a female prostitute, He went on to attack the two police officers who arrested him, causing injuries that had to be treated in hospital.
One would have thought that in any country that regarded itself to be civilised, such criminal conduct would invariably result in a prison sentence. But, no, MacFarlane, now a violent double sex offender, has powerful friends. He did not go to prison. It was deemed by Elish Angiolini`s Crown Office, “not to be in the public interest” to jail him, leaving him free to re-offend.
It was decided, however, by Angiolini, to be in the public interest for Rusty and me to be imprisoned.
It may reasonably be asked exactly who are these members of the public in whose interests Angiolini has purported to act?
We all agree no one should be named but
THE SHERIFFS DEFENCE IS A MASTER STROKE OF SCOTS LAW AND WE DETAIL IT
BELOW AND SUMMARISE IT IN THREE WORDS
IT WISNAE ME